Saturday, April 4, 2020

12,704. RUDIMENTS, pt. 1,015

RUDIMENTS, pt. 1,015
(that must have gone over big)
Newark New Jersey, back
in its day, used to be quite
the hotspot for jazz clubs.
In addition to the New York 
scene, the 1940's, etc. black
jazz players made an entire
scene there of appearances,
gigs, recordings. Older photos
of the area at Broad and Market
show numerous marquees, clubs 
and drink-spots. It's, alas, all
gone now, like everything else
from those days. Newark was
left to crumble, as a dis-service,
in the very typical, white suburban
fashion, to blacks. Negroes. Niggers.
Whatever 1950's word was used to
characterize that portion of the
black population. (I want you to
know that I wrote out here the
entire N-word, to make my point.
I'm sure facebook will disallow it.
But that then too makes my point.
Idiocy ascendant. The legacy of
dis-respect, theft and stealth about
the back population is long and
legendary. All of a sudden pretending
a sort of 'respect' for it reeks of
hipster-yuppie bullshit.
-
Chinese people eating rodents and
causing an epidemic worldwide. I
probably can't say that either. Jewish
tribals effecting an exceptionalism
that they alone are outside the rules 
and regulations in place for everyone
else also makes me sick. The whole
world is upside down and I don't
like none of it. OK?
-
What do you think the world needs
now to be energized? Probably a
military complication is not far
off; another distant war-theater to
act as a diversionary tactic, churcn
up some more guys, and kill a bunch
of locals who are only 'local' to
somewhere else and thereby of little
concerns to us. I think everything's 
been manipulated, BUT not by one
or another of the sides, but by the
force that's 'over' each of the sides.
Hidden manipulators. You really
think it makes a rat's-ass worth of
difference whether we continue with
the gloriously peevish ignorance of
Trump, or the ignominious aged
zombie-force petrol face of Biden, or 
the ready-to-break-out imperiousness
of Sanders? You really think any of
those other fallen-away candidates,
or the Clintonians of any ilk make
a difference? No way, Jose. This
is the real world; I'm talking the
proverbial western equivalent of
the hammer and the sickle. It's all
already part of a greater five-year
plan in some vast conspirational
takeover-slowly planbook. The
plague is but a late-game elbow
thrust to the chest now.
-
This manipulation runs the entire
gamut, and because in actuality
I do very little, the only part of
this gamut I get to see is the one
that touches on those things I
am concerned with. Not social
niceties, not business, not commerce,
not correct discourse. I detest all
of that and see it merely as a cloud
of smoke thrown up between people  -
all those 'niceties and best wishes'  - 
so they really don't need to deal
directly with each other. The
few things I deal with are less
affected by the general rot 
around me, but affected they
get nonetheless. Normal writer
procedure now would be for me 
to throw in a few examples of
what I mean. But I'm not doing
so. Bad writer! Heel! Bad!
-
Early America, the colonies, the
Puritans, certainly, never had a
written culture. It was verbal, and
by words. The public-speech, the
sermon, even the 'commencement'
address or whistle-stop tour campaign
speech, sufficed for heavy-hitting.
But they always had to be 'official'
to maintain that distance. Not real.
That in itself must have been very
limiting. Writing allows so much
more of a reflective freedom, even
over the edge, to get across emotions
and ideas that for the most part, in
day to day face contact, people would
shy away from. On one hand, I always
tended to think of the early aettlements
and arrival days as free and unfettered,
but in many respects they were worse;
probably almost strait-jacketed, unles
one took oneself way off, to a 'frontier.'
And it's pretty funny when you can
think of a 'frontier' being, maybe, 70
miles west. Cross the upper Delaware
River, for example, and you were gone.
-
But, back to the spoken against the
written word, in colonial days...
a 'spoken' body or words is a
different thing, because it sort of
assumes a common body of values
and a shared discourse, words,
and approaches. Has to be, otherwise
why would anyone back then have
assembled or listened. There wasn't
much dissension, and everyone
assumed and shared the same ideas.
Community; as rigorous and punitive
as it may have gotten. Why people
ever lived like that is beyond me,
and why they enforced it on the
locals and natives, in the most
punitive ways, is even more
beyond me. I know I'd have
been gone, and with a gun too.
The 'spoken' word is always
more topical, and pushy too, like
a sermon or some gushy moral
crap making its point.. Preaching.
Yuck. Those Puritan and Protestant
people had locked themselves into
a dead corner but good : If the
intermediaries between humankind
and God were to be done away
with, then the 'message' of God
had to be brought home to each 
person. In order to do that, the
sermonizer or the preacher then
had to assume he or she knew
what that message was meant to
be. I always figured that in itself'
to be vain and pretentious, and
really no better, behaviorally or
by doctrine, than having that
same presumption delivered by
some weird mitre-head and
robed reptilian priest, bishop,
cardinal or pope. (Whew! What
a line up!). Like a big belt on a
skinny guy  -  way too many 
holes on it. Most of those
sermon guys were bloviators
anyway, thinking they were 
wiser and more important than 
everyone, or feigning a humility
by which to get over one the
poor suckers they were talking
down. All that church and religion
taffy is just bullshit anyway. The
best of anything comes from within,
and is yours and yours alone, as
the person bearing the message 
direct. Of course there were no
books or writings  -  at that point
all these blowhards lose control.
-
Jeremy Taylor. John Donne. All
those frightful English and Puritan
sermons. It all became style after
a while  - some hot-wired preacher
guy spouting fear while eyeing
the wives in the first few rows. 
John Donne, and Lancelot
Andrews (cool name), had a
'high, metaphysical' style to
their stuff. The Puritans in the
'New' world came at it differently.
They developed a 'plain' style,
as it came to be called : a lighter
wording, a strong attempt at
persuasion; and they got all
practical instead of metaphysical.
How to live an everyday life; where
to put the forks and spoons, so
to speak. 'The Puritan sermon
was more like a lawyer's brief'
than a work of art.' So said one
Perry Miller. Sermons in the
plain style were 'in every way
the opposite of high-faluting; 
swelling words of humane
wisdom.' John cotton said that
was Jesus' way, in speaking: 'He
gave men an intimation, kind of
spoke their own in English, as
we say. He let fly poynt blanck.'
Two germane phrases by preachers
then were, "God's altar does not
need our pollishings," and "The
resurrected body is like a great
onyn. Like an onyn hung up on
a wall, the resurrected body grows
not because anything is added,
but because it spreads itself further;
so then there shall be no new body,
but the same substance enlarged
and increased." (Huh? That's not
exactly as plain and clear as they
say...and I wonder what the
dieting Pilgrim ladies thought 
of that one? The same body, 
enlarged' and increased?'
That must have gone over 
big. No pun intended....
-
A culture without writing is
just a dead hole in the ground.
We may be bad, but I don't
think we've yet reached that 
nadir; and I hope we never do.




No comments: