Sunday, June 30, 2019

11,872. RUDIMENTS, pt. 731

RUDIMENTS, pt. 731
('get your hands off my risers')
One time, about 1988, I
was in a movie. That sounds
so big deal to say, but it's
really just a pile of crap.
Jeff Goldblum, Roseanna
Arquette, Rory Cochrane,
and even Samuel L. Jackson,
for jeeper's sake. The story
is so long and dreary about
how I got involved that it's
almost laughable. Now, I
admit, I and my cohorts
here aren't in any sort of
feature role, but there
is a story to tell and I'll
tell it. Eventually.
-
There's a mass of people
about today, out on the
everyday hustings  -  news
people, 'political correctness'
and cause junkies; they 'proclaim'
(which is about all they do). The
things they proclaim are actually
totalitarian demands for their
own versions of things and
nothing more. It's been a long
time already, and I'm quite sick
of it. The main premise of these
folks is the false proclamation
of some sort of moral superiority
for themselves and their cause,
over that of others. They seek
only to make other people feel
bad. There is no joy involved,
no grace or enlightenment.
Just a scratchy and parched
negativity that lets them go
and spit back at others; at
others. But they won't take
anything back from you.
In fact, you're not even
supposed to or be allowed
to think unless it's in their,
special, self-righteous
God-awful way. They're
not satisfied unless you can
first be made to feel really
small, sad, and sorry about
yourself. I call them five-year
people; because that's about
their longest attention span for
anything, and by then they're
on to something else and forget
all about whatever it is today
had them so viciously occupied
with. Problem is, their tattoos
don't then go away, their gender
heave-ho's often get them
screwed up too, and a lot of the
detritus of their old, past lives
comes with no back roads or
exit lanes. They're stuck.
-
This movie thing was funny. 
It all had to do with motorcycles; 
they sought maybe 15 Biker 
types, for a scene in a film. 
It was to film overnight, on 
something like March 1,
about 1988. The premise 
of the  movie was some crap 
about a father, (Jeff Goldblum), 
reconciling with an estranged 
son (Rory Calhoun, I think it 
was), who, of course, is found 
to be mixed up with the wrong
crowd, which in this case involved
nasty Bikers, a biker den (a beach
house on the water in Belmar, NJ,
which in the film was meant to
be Asbury Park, where Roseanna 
Arquette was that fortune-telling 
lady, already of some note for
having been mentioned in some
Springsteen song. Very tenuous,
all these connections, but, that's
how it went. The Bikers had some
new drug, an LSD-type product 
they peddled  -  much of it out
of the nasty, crowded beach-house
they kept. Which is where we came
in. My coterie of Bikers. (I watch
these scenes now, can see the faces
and remember the people, guys, and
girls. Some are dead. Some are lost
to me. Others, I still know of, where
they live, etc. It's all strange), was to
mill around, pretend at tough, nasty,
strange. No lines, nothing to speak,
just extras to the noisy scene(s), as
the varied stars did their stuff, and,
in some cases, had their scenes
spliced in as if they were present.
Adjoining rooms, lover scenes, etc.
All very stupid and beyond compare,
but funny as hell to do. The scenes,
which is what took up the 8 or so 
overnight hours, were done over
and over and over. 15, 20 takes.
For no reason ever, that I could
see. We were supplied with fake
beer ('near beer') to be drinking,
and all the cigarettes we desired.
(It was a heavy, smokers' scene
and the haze in the room was, 
authentic). [Funny how that goes.
I was passing through a town 
yesterday and there was one of
those pedestrian crossing things,
and the sign read 'Heavy Pedestrian
Crossing.' I chuckled and commented
to those with me  -  'Look at that, 
they have dedicated crosswalks for
fat people!'].
-
Anyway. back to this film-scene,
Killer/Biker montage : During all
these re-takes, and the waiting and
the breaks in between, my handyman
friend John  -  always quite the 
character anyway  -  had it upon
himself to stay quite busy. (We 
helped, inasmuch as it meant
carting things away and into his
three large bike-saddlebags). He
was progressively stripping the
house of anything that could be
unscrewed and taken away. Really,
no BS. That meant light-switch and
plug coverings, small fixtures, some
moldings, outlet-joints, wires, and
the like. In addition, on the outside,
having found the supply trailer for
the shoot (left open and unattended),
there were multi-paks, 16 or 24 at a
time, of batteries  -  D-size, A and
triple A's, etc. A veritable battery
bonanza. This all ended only when,
under the further influence of the
cold beers in his saddlebag, and a
bar down the street (where, during
a 'dinner-break' we were treated
at no charge to a large smorgasbord
of free food, and beer. Believe me,
these actor schmucks eat well),
John discovered the make-up trailer
of one of these starlets in the scenes.
She was bored to shit, lounging,
a little annoyed, but free and happy
too, which is all Johnny-boy needed
to realize. He went at her with great
style and charm. It was working
too, until Security caught up to him
at the off-limits trailers. He was
shooed off, with no further ado.
-
I'll have more about all this,
next chapter, but one last
comment : After the starlet scene,
at the trailer, with John, he said
something like  -  memorable, and
I remember  -  'She was so bored,
now I know why they carry
around all those battery-paks.'
---
(end of pt. One)



Saturday, June 29, 2019

11,871. ALL THE DEAD BOATS OF RUNNEMEDE BAY

ALL THE DEAD BOATS 
OF RUNNEMEDE BAY
Nothing much goes anywhere; they
each just stay. No water worth the
running of in Runnemede Bay.
The world of slime the Rahway
runneth has a tidal rise and a
tidal fall no different than the
tides of Mankind, all.

Friday, June 28, 2019

11,870. ARE YOU ABLE TO DUPLICATE YOUR RESULTS?

ARE YOU ABLE TO 
DUPLICATE YOUR RESULTS?
The audacious nature of your
experiment certainly keeps us
engaged. Water into wine, well,
maybe that was one thing  -  yet
this is something quite again.
As it now becomes a total other
step  -  bones from marrow, you
say? But, wouldn't you first need
the bone? Like a chicken or the
egg joke, but this one cannot be.
I think we need to intercept here
what you're doing? Blood from
rusty water? In the junk and rail
yards everywhere? That would
certainly change the world; yes,
but, we'd need to know what type.
Of blood, of course. There are
more than one. What is that you
say? Bison have 52 different
blood types? Is that true?
(Yes, it is). My, my, and 
goodness again.

18,869. RUDIMENTS, pt. #730

RUDIMENTS, pt. 730
(this here cat, on a hot tin
roof / just as it is for me)
'On these shoulders stand the
smallest men in the world.'
That came to me in a dream
one night, a long time ago,
and is probably the stupidest
thing ever too. It was about
the same level of occurrence
as the time I looked out the
front upstairs window of
the house on Inman Avenue
I lived in  -  it was actually
my sister's room; she was
about 10. I craned leftward,
so that I could see as far down
the block as Clifford's house  -
one of the families down the
block. But in doing that, the
line of sight was somehow
intersected with the light
fixture on a streetlamp just
past the house or two next
to mine  -  Wynne's, Fehring's.
Because of that I somehow
misread what I saw (the
projecting lamp fixture), as
a UFO that had landed atop
the Clifford house roof. They
had a telephone pole out front
too. It was a special one, for
me, because it had one of those
blue-light, fire-alarm boxes on
it, with the little light always on.
Anyway, back to the UFO  -  I
swore I had witnessed a landing.
The fixture, the 'bulb' and light
hub, somehow  -  from the angle
I viewed it  -  resembled a saucer
on their roof and no one could
convince me otherwise. Until
later, I forget how long later,
I realized what I'd seen, which
illusion of optics then led me,
of course, farther into things of
that nature, ending me up, most
probably, just this side of M. W.
Escher. Now I look at it all and
laugh, but back then it was real
business and an almost-terror
too. I was pretty spooked.
-
I never fully realized myself  -
even in NYC  -  and I often
wondered if many people ever
do. I've known lots of people,
and the ones more successful
about things, alas for them,
were mostly in business. They
may have 'realized' themselves
but they always seemed so
caught up in things they they
never seemed to 'enjoy'
themselves  -  which I figured
to be more important than the
rather fleeting advantage and
flag of money and onnection.
If they were 'comics' people
or rendered graphically, they'd
probably be drawn as haggard,
hunched over figures with a
huge safe tied to their back,
laboriously carting it around,
with the drawing-marks for
sweat, toil, and anguish showing
everywhere around them  (Of
course, if someone were to draw
ME, that same image could just
as much apply  -  joke's on me,
but at least it's not about money).
-
You now the cliche'd figure of
the standard 'Villain.' Cartoons
and all have always been filled
with that. I'm not so sure what 
(or if) would be today's image
of a colloquial villain. Probably
the President. Or any President.
It really wouldn't matter because
the activity now is completely
know-nothingism anyway. No 
one knows a thing about any 
of it; they just do what they're
led to do. They're all just
envious, and want what he (or
she) has. That's probably the 
villain today  -  but how do
cartoonists today portray Greed?
That's what they're all still at
work on, searching it out.
-
Back in the early-80's, when
things weren't yet so untidy  -
round here, I mean  -  Woodbridge,
NJ  -  a friend or two and myself
started up a Barron Arts Center
monthly thing called PoetsWednesday.
It's still around, but no one of today's
grouping knows a damned thing
about its genesis  -  maybe a guy
named Joe Weil, out in Binghamton
now. He took it over when we left.
Anyway, after we beat out heads
against the wall, with hard work,
lots of energy, and planning too,
by a year or two later we had
some really cool stuff going.
We were getting maybe 40 people,
on a good night, for these things,
and the gamut of what we did
was pretty wide. (Now it's been
turned into one of those things 
where there's a 'featured' poet of
whatever local note, and then 
anyone else can read too, but
before the evening starts there's
an hour 'workshop' with the
featured poet and people bring
their poetry tries in and some
sort of group-operation takes
place to improve the work-in-
progress. I've never gone, but I've
been in the other room waiting
and have heard the comments 
and format of the session. Ain't
for me (They'd surely correct
that)). We never had any of
those. A few nights we had
script readings, and one time
we dramatized something by
Thornton Wilder. It was all 
great fun, and edifying too.
John Lennon, as I recall, was
killed during this time, so I
guess some of it was at the
end of 1980 too. (Ain't it
funny, how time slips away).
-
Well, my point was about how
cartoonish it often seemed to me.
The people who came, many of
them, were parodies. They
could easily have been cartoons.
There was an older guy, like 70,
a big guy, out of shape and sloppy,
who spent most of his days sitting
in a mall, and he'd write about that.
You had to hear it, but there was a
lot about the girls going by, the
family things he'd see, etc. Nothing
very good, but funny. Then there
was this other fellow, also always
a return visitor, with stuff like,
opening line : 'Jogger girl, jogging
in sweater.' Really. A fantasy poem
about the jogger who'd just swept by
him. Then we had this kid from
Westfield, and his girlfriend. He's
still around, Peter Gadol, actually,
in California, and has a few books
published. He often dedicated
his poems to 'Shantih Clemans.'
He had a girlfriend, but I'm not
sure if that was her name. And
there was a music girl, with a
little band  -  angry, dense music.
I think she was from up by Newark
or the Oranges somewhere. And
then there was another girl, early 
Goth  -  always wore black; was 
dark and mysterious. Piercings. 
She wrote harsh poetry, always 
about blood and violence; about 
hurting others, wounds and 
revenge. It got pretty scary, 
and one (me anyway) never
quite knew what to say back.
Then there were the usual
high-schoolers; their romantic
and love poetry; old couples
swooning over flowers and
the sea, wiscracking old guys
going on about cars and old
flames. It was a trip, and if it
had been catalogued in some 
sort of graphics fashion, it 
could have been very cool. 
Wish I'd have been on top 
of that some.
-
So, to see, or to envision, the
entire active world before one's self
as a cartoon strip sort of come to life
adds an entire other dimension to 
the dancing panoply of movement
before you. If these comic things
could walk, how would they walk?
What 'gait' would they have? Would
it somehow be characteristic of that
which you envisioned them as? How 
would they speak, and react? Would
it be just like the word-balloon words
given to them? Really? Would all
their words and actions encompass
and embody our world? The way
things are now? Would they really
understand? Or would it all be
 just because you say it is? All
of this, everywhere, this world
around us, has changed and been
changed so drastically, could they
ever know  -  or (wouldn't) they
have instead to invent some
entirely new way of being? 
Otherwise, for them, wouldn't it
just be 1947-49, over and over,
forever and ever, just as
it is  -  for me?






11,868. RUDIMENTS, pt. 729

RUDIMENTS, pt. 729
(sic transit gloria mundi)
There was always a difference
to me in storytelling; the means
of it anyway. My father would
buy and read the 'comics' of the
Sunday newspapers, almost
religiously, and as a form of
high, personal literature to him.
Going over each, while slurping
a cup of light coffee, at the same
table where we ate as a family. It
was Sunday ritual  -  the comics,
and the dining too. He was very
strict about Sundays. You could
set your watch by when the food
came out, on Sundays. It was
always the same, maybe 2pm.
I actually forget  -  which is
pretty unbelievable. Perhaps here
is some sort of rebellious son
later-in-life act of getting back
at the father by forgetting his
rituals. Maybe I just need
(another?) shrink.
-
I decided long back to discard the
rest of the world and find my own
means of personal infamy. Done!
If you get around to everything,
leaving your mark on all you can,
it's fairly plausible that your rank
and name will come up in lots of
conversations  -  for good or bad.
Enemies will be plenty, by that
logic. I always felt that they were
close enough to enemas, actually,
so as not to matter, except for
being their own pain in the butt.
-
Back to Dad and those comics.
I never liked comic art. What's
now mostly called 'Graphic'  -
they do everything like that now,
as if people just learned to draw,
as if cuneiform and hieroglyphs
never happened. There are 'graphic
novels' of the Bible and Moby Dick
too. Most every level of 'litrature'
has been rendered, 'Anne of Green
Gables' to 'How to Build Tables.'
That last one is, (I speculate) a
book of drawings for carpenters
and woodworkers. The thing was
to me, always more about the
lack of words and the lack of the
sort of 'intelligent' outlook (at
least) which words impart. Trying
to bluff by, in a comic-book way,
without words, or with a scarce
few, or thought-bubbles or just the
exclamations (or unjust exclamations
as well), of 'Oomph' and 'POW!'
never made sense. The lines are
rough and woodcutty, jugged or
not refined. The senses of placement
and flow don't often seem right,
and the panel by panel delivery is
a pain  -  both to do and to read.
Give me words and thoughts, in
a paragraph any day. BUT, at
another level, it all worked for
my father. He seemed always
satisfied and able to extrapolate
the line work into the ideas needed
or presented. Perhaps that was
intelligence working, on his part,
or maybe they were just done well
enough  -  from Dick Tracy to
Moon Mullins; Terry and the
Pirates to Gasoline Alley; Allie
Oop to Prince Valiant. The
short-cut of the line drawing
must have been treasured by
many. Whatever it was, by the
years around 1960, it was all
in place. Much of everything
had been changed over to the
edicts of advertising, TV, movies,
entertainment, product dispersal,
and the load of junk then being
produced and sold as the shining
goodness of the great American
materialist dream. No one thought
twice about emptiness or angst.
Jean Paul Sartre was seen as an
ugly, turtle-faced, crank.
-
America by that time had already
erupted, sort of surreptitiously.
There had already been 'Beatniks'
and drop-outs, mostly they just
were pointed out or talked of.
A couple of those mass-murder
type guys had already killed
people, from towers and car
killing sprees; town-to-town
stuff, like a 1950's Bonnie and
Clyde thing but there wasn't yet
a massive mass-media push
behind it all to blab it and push
it along  -  the idea of talking up
your Charles Starkweather and
that sort of thing didn't get
rolling until like the Vietnam
murders started, or the 'Charlie
Manson does the mansion'
action movie starring Sharon
Tate. Etc. Once the Vietnam
rehearsals were done, it was
all over -   crazy guys came home
with fixations, and everything
was then given permission
to go nuts. Later, even the
expression 'My, my!' had to
be changed to 'My Lai!' As
in massacre. As in Alice's
Restaurant. Whew!!!!
(Do you see how that was
just done? In a comic-book
style of quick-writing, but
without the graphics!!)...
-
Man, I love all that crap. The
doing of it and the thinking of
it. But, let me get back here
to serious matter : I'm about
to try and walk all this into
Al Capp, and society 'then'.
Charles Dickens began as a
comic writer, writing what
would be referred to as
'captions' now, for a then
popular cartoonist. By
practice, the 'comic' image
remains about as crude as
the rough drawing that can
give an idea of the semblance
of the 'dotted' TV image.
It's a draw-down for anything
complicated or 'intense,' so 
that even the simplest of 
viewers (or 'readers?) can 
grasp it. Early on, in fact,
they retained most of the
characteristics of their
woodcut forerunners  -  by
1895, Hearst Newspapers
had established the comics,
as features and as supplements,
to their newspapers. As simple
and manufactured as was their
'news'  -  so too went their comics.
Early comics were, 'The Yellow
Kid,' and 'Hogan's Alley,' which
is what it was, at first, called.
'Maggie and Jiggs.' Each was
a low-definition but participational
for of (new) 'entertainment. The
commentary was very light, and
required fill-in by the reader.
When TV finally did come
along  -  and precisely for many 
of the same qualities  -  it hit
comics very hard. Things were
changing quickly, including the
stance, location, and attitude 
of readers. They needed a
'newer world,' and thus the
comics began evolving. One
of the biggest impacts was upon
Al Capp's 'Li'l Abner'  -  for 18
years Capp had kept Abner
on the verge of a Daisy Mae 
marriage. Capp had flipped the
Stendahl approach (Stendahl
was a writer), which had been
'I simply involve my people
in the consequences of their 
own stupidity, and give them
brains so they can suffer.' Capp's
version was to involve his
people in the consequences of 
their own stupidity and then
'take away their brains so
they can do nothing about it.' 
Their inability to help themselves
became a parody of all other
'suspense' comics. The helpless
ineptitude of Dogpatch was,
essentially, the human situation. 
Once TV arrived, Capp found
his forms of distortion no
longer worked. He felt Americans
had lost the ability to laugh
at themselves  -  though he,
it is written, was wrong. 'TV
had simply involved everybody
in everybody more deeply than
before.' He had then to refocus
the Li'l Abner image. Al Capp's
wonderful brew of poking fun,
and parody, had to be toned
down. He did so. Ordinary
life, as portrayed and presented
through TV, had become as
funny as anything in Dogpatch!
MAD Magazine, by this time,
and in turn, had sort of taken
over where the original Abner
had left off. By the 1950's it
seemed the beatniks and MAD
Magazine and Alfred E. Neuman
had the message more right.
Sic transit gloria mundi.
-
The old ideas of 'genteel' art
reflected old society, buttressed
old tastes. Picasso and Joyce 
(James Joyce) were fans of 
American comics  -  sparkling,
dynamic. Genteel art evaded
and disapproved all that it did
not know  -  it 'repeats' the
industrial world, still doing so
today. Popular art, through
the comics, became the means
of the clown reminding us of
all we've lost through society.
I don't know if that's how my
father did or would have seen
any of this as he chuckled in
his Sunday coffee. But I did.
Or do now anyway.
---
Part 3 to follow.