Monday, October 28, 2019

12,237. RUDIMENTS, pt. 851

RUDIMENTS, pt. 851
(yeah, well)
I have always had a pretty
much randomly-associative
mind. That  -  along with a
creative bent  -  has often
enough gotten me into
trouble, or the displeasure
of others, at least. It happens
often, sometimes blandly,
others time as roughly as a
severe and vivid hallucination.
I've never filtered myself much,
nor stopped the effort. Most
others can't understand that.
They take offense at the
stupidest particle of the
matter at hand, as if by
pointing out the word 'fun'
in funeral means I'm belittling
their dead Uncle Charlie. Lighten
up, folks. If I operated in that
same fashion over things I hear
people saying, I'd be known as
the sledge-hammer skull masher.
There has to be a certain divide,
a difference between the active
mental life and the drudgery
that is the ordinary world, and
it takes a functional brain to
see that, make the leap, bridge
the gulf, and get on with
happiness. Or, for pity's sake,
go ahead and take your damned
Cap'n Crunch elsewhere.
-
Over the coarse of time, I've
wondered heavily about hundreds
of things. When I bought that
farmhouse in Pennsylvania,
out front, across the dirt road,
I guess maybe 50 or 60 paces
off, was an outhouse building.
It was the usual, red, wooden,
with a doorway, and a sliver
moon cut-out, etc. Probably
it was 80 or 100 years old.
There were two 'adult' seats in
it, and, at the end, and lower,
with a smaller seat-hole, a
child's seat. Whenever you
read of someone talking, in
their 'old' days, recollections
or old tales, you read of the
smell as they approached the
outhouse, or the odoriferous
stench it emitted, etc. The
cliched idea of an outhouse
had always been stench. Their
standards, yes, of cleanliness
and purity were much, much
different than ours  -  and they'd
probably laugh at us. Remember, a
hundred years ago from the 1970's
was the 1870's, with people yet
reeling from open corpses, raw
memories of the putrefied and
horrific dead and bloated, dying
or groaning, sometimes for days,
on farm fields and at streambeds.
We've denied all of that, in our
equally decrepit days. I used
to wonder, in light of all that,
how in the world the person or
people who started and began
the ideas of indoor toilets,
bathrooms and plumbing, etc.,
presented their ideas. The house
I was in, no longer needing that
outhouse, had taken two rooms,
one on each floor (there were
plenty of rooms, and I'm sure
none were missed), and had
them converted into the rooms
of the newly-installed toilets and
plumbing. I don't know when, or
any of that  -  they were larger
rooms, just basic square places
that had once been bedrooms.
They were purely utilitarian
at that point. I wondered how
much convincing it took to
bring people around to the idea
of having all that inside their
own homes? "You mean you're
bringing the outhouse in here?
That's what I heard? You're
saying that a flow of water
will cover all this over, no
smell, no mess, and take it
swiftly away and OUT of
the house? To somewhere else?
Hmmm. Isn't that just really
making two outhouses? How
do you propose this to work?"
It all would have gone on
from there, I guess. Bringing
in experts from what were then
called the 'Sanitary Commission,'
to explain and go over all this at
local meetings and meeting halls.
Convincing the old codgers it
might work, they'd no longer have
to slog through the weather, wet.
cold, snow, rain. A certain ease
of living would be given to them?
Boy, that must have been a hard
sell. I can only imagine. The
idea of the 'water closet' was
a new idea indeed.
-
In all my dealings with that scene,
no one ever made mention of the
period of transition. Up and
through those old Bradford County
Hills, there were outhouses like
that, unused, everywhere. Either
they became tool sheds, or were
filled with tires and junk, or
firewood. They sure lingered, but
I never saw a'one in use, so I
guess the other idea took. It's
funny how we just move on
from things, and in a generation
or two the idea of how the original
idea took hold was gone. I found
that with lots: ice; refrigeration;
hard-surface roadways, driveways,
and more. Another good one that,
this one, I often mentioned and
pointed out, was about how many
of those older homes were only
electrified later on. When you
went in many of these homes,
mine included, in parts, you'd
see a straight line, of thick,
fabric insulated wire or conduit,
running down each wall, into
or towards a baseboard and a
plug or two. Very minimal. In
some homes, with the wires,
you could see they had been
painted over many times;
others had them nicely
covered with a good quality
molding, perhaps. Anyway,
past the  time of lanterns and
open flame lighting, and gas,
these were all retro-fits inside
the homes for that new-fangled
'lectricity that had come around.
Now, when they build, yes, it's 
all part of the initial design and
construction, inside walls,
in metal junction boxes, well
concealed and protected too.
That then must have been a real
job, for convincing people to
take a chance on:  as the streets
and dirt lanes and all the rest
were slowly, over time, being
wired and given poles. I'd imagine,
in every case, it began in the
larger 'centers' of each town,
and village, burg and city. Maybe
once the larger places got it all
and seemed comfortable with it,
and after a long time (and of
course the needed expansion of
the 'Government' up into the
high-hills and low-hollows, where
the people were way more solitary,
out of touch, and not as attuned
to the mainstream of things),
everyone else accepted it more.
Such modernizations could
have been a real battle, a hit to
the head. Those sorts of folk
don't take kindly to change, and
even less to 'taxable' services
they hadn't asked for. Toilets,
water, and electric light. 'First
I gotta' pay for my own ass, and
now again, they want me to pay
for my eyes.' Yeah, well. It's
about like that Jennings guy
I've written of, with all his
schoolbus fights.
-
It was matters like that which
always kept me just one step,
it seemed, astray from others.
The questionable aspects of
things, that 'other' side of the
coin. it still goes on. Like, right
here, where we live now, as
a for instance  -  there's a
fire official, who's also a
Councilman. I wonder, what
do we get, really, for our money?
We pay for his salary and his
'services,' clipboarding fire
exams and reports. He gets a 
vehicle, gasoline services, and
the rest. OK, that's fine, and
part of the deal, I guess. Now, 
the 'Councilman' part  -  others
who are councilman have
corporate jobs, careers, etc.
They do their work, and the
'Council' part of it is kept separate
or done on their off-times. I
often wonder, the politicking 
of it all, the normal routine BS, 
when this fire guy is on the
books as a fire official, getting
paid, how much (if any) of
that salaried time is then spent,
within the confines of that
firehouse deal, on Council
business, which is not supposed
to happen on that payroll dollar.
What exactly do we get from 
that, and why is nothing ever
asked? It's like having that
late wiring brought into a
house, after the fact of the
house's construction. The 
add-on is obvious, as is the
paint and the molding 
covering it over. The
guy's got it made. He does
his Mayor's bidding, plays
the political angle, and the rest,
and we pay him. Hmmm?
Shouldn't there maybe become
an overlapping, conflict law put
put in place? Maybe he could 
even introduce it, at one of
them there meetings he sits at.
Of course, then he would have
to be on the spot for actually
doing something to advance his
community, and his representation 
of it instead of lap-dogging at the 
Mayor's lead-lines. There's no 
guarantee of any real 'competence,' 
with these sorts of things though.
Like I said in the beginning
I'm pretty much a randomly
associative guy. I know about
America, and the fabric of 
Democracy, and all that crap.
Things just never add up, and,
like the outhouse deal, it stinks.




No comments: