Thursday, October 17, 2019

12,204. RUDIMENTS. pt. 841

RUDIMENTS, pt. 841
(grounded in wrong things)
One night of some far-fetched
happening, I can recall being
on my back on the dirt road,
late into the darkness, and
looking up at the stars. A
cousin of mine and her
boyfriend had come up to
visit for a few days and
she'd brought with her the
information that it was to
be one of those meteor
shower nights, Perseids
or whichever one. And at
her request we'd gone out
in the late darkness to bask.
It was cool, and there were,
in the black and open skies
of that area, a mass of stars
to see. You often get this
geekiness thing now, with
urban people, and suburban
too, where they get all weird
and Druidic over 20 stars its
given to them to maybe see
in a local night sky. I can't
figure why they even bother,
let alone load it up with all
their bogus mystical crap
when 99% of the stars aren't
even visible to them and they
haven't a clue. Boy, I hate that
stuff  -  those skinny, fey guys
and their clean-fabric girlfriends
waxing poetic and chanting the
antic for their fake spiritualism.
And they they run right back
home to their condo laundry-room
the next day to get the stains out.
What a bunch of crapola. This
at least was different : far-off
high Pennsylvania sky, deep
and dense blackness, things
astir everywhere. It could all
almost mean something.
-
A thing about the night sky, and
I think I've covered this before,
is the dimensionality of it. That's
what always amazed me  -  the
depth of the profusion. You never
have a realization of that from
photos, diagrams or pictures. It's
actually lacy and gauzy  -  some 
'stars' closer than other 'stars' by the
thousands, or millions, or whatever
it is, and that diversity draws you
right in as you realize the point
from which you are viewing is
also part of that! The 3-d aspect
of it goes all around you. It was
always of a particular catch to stop
some and make me reflect.This was
way-out country darkness, flat out
on a dirt-road and we were looking 
up, and it was stunning. In Elmira,
as well, there was an observatory at
the Elmira campus too, and each
time I was there I went through
this sensation of falling through
space. Free-Fall. It's something
the human body accommodates
itself to, by remaining unaware
of it, and to its, workings. As
in so many other things  - 
imagine if we had been designed
instead so that we didn't have
that innate capacity of overlooking
the hundreds of things that our
bodies are doing at any moment:
eye-blinks, heart-pumps, digestion.
blood-flow, aches and itches of a
moment  -  we'd be distracted to
death. The perfection, as far as
it goes anyway, of our design is
in part due to the fact that we can
operate, and function, at any one
time on 'automatic' and thereby
unawares of the operation we
inhabit. So it is with the distension
of falling through space. When
you come right down to it, that's
what it all amounts to  -  even
though we've got plenty of
theories and functional laws
to explain it all away  -  gravity,
the 'relativistic' relationships
of time and distance, speed,
weight, and density  -  we are
falling through space, dead,
blank, and empty space and
our premise is that all things
falling together, as one, make
the falling unknowable. Try
speeding some day, so as to
get pulled over by a cop, who
will say, 'Where's the fire, Bud?'
and you answer, Well, Officer, no
fire, but I was trying to outrun
the fall.' --  OK, and I guess.
-
Now, for something completely
different : As does occasionally
happen, these last few days again
I've had someone dogging me, a
non-facebook person, but a reader,
for things I've written  -  despicable
opinions, my vile stances. I enjoy it
all. I'll call him 'Tim,' which is
not the real name at all. How many
Bikers have PhD's; what bikers
are research fellows, etc., and why
should anyone want them in their
neighborhood? He asks. Fine. Well
put, though I did turn it back on
him, about Iselin, and said he'd
missed the point and had it ass
backwards. First off, it was ancient
history; I'm not a 'Biker.' Old Iselin 
WAS the biker's neighborhood
and the newcomers were the
interlopers, so the question, 
if it had to be asked, would 
be why would they (Bikers) 
want the newcomers in their 
neighborhood. Anyway, all that
does is incense Tim more, about
me. There's something about
titles and degrees, I think, to
those who don't have them, 
that makes them highly 
esteemed and ultra important.
To Tim anyway. As I see it, a
dullard remains a dullard no
matter what trails the name, 
and the pretense, that goes 
with giving that a predominance.
The reverse of 'cat got your
tongue' is 'This cat got too much
tongue. Shut it.' Which is what
he tells me to do time after time.
Now, I've been in a lot of places,
and situations  -  I've been among
the most greedy title-seekers
and intellectual (supposed) 
pursuers, but I've always liked
the bakers and bikers and bilkers
better. The idea that 'Colleges' are
the right grounds for creative
growth and/or research, is way
off base. In a kind of ordinary,
everyday manner with these people,
you never hear the words envy,
spite, generosity, compassion,
timidity, etc  -  the actual motives
of a basic person's life. It's all
instead muddled into things like
gain and value, cost and effort
against loss and prestige. As if
those things matter; like whose
garage is larger so it can be filled
with more shit. Those are the lines
I draw  -  kind of as markers for
the border of Humanity, as I
would live it. The social nature
of society gets corrupted by
these sorts of 'professional class'
people. Intent on 'improving'
everything by the expansion of
the bad, and the advertising for
profit of that badness. Train
station access next to new, bad
apartments? That's a genius class
for sure. Titles, certificates,
member-class cards, they do
little to advance the mass, but
they do make it easier for the
tabulator, more or less guaranteeing
that the ones who get to fill the
jobs selected will not be up to the
task. And therein is the difference.
I go with the low-brow, thanks. 
The right functions of schools and
research have been corrupted, as
well, by these titled folk, making
it all incestuously staffed by dull
academics. Leave me out, and let
those raucous pretty guys in.
-
In his book 'The Problem Of Lay
Analysis,' Freud said that it was
extremely unlikely that a young
man who would throw the best
years of his life into the cloistered
drudgery of getting an M.D. degree
could possibly make a good
psychoanalyst; so he  preferred to
look for analysts among the writers,
the lawyers, the mothers of families;
those who had chosen human contacts.
But, in their economic wisdom, the
Psychoanalytic Institute of Vienna 
(and New York) overruled him.
That's about as typical as throwing
a high-hat used to be in Iselin.
Once you get grounded in wrong 
things, all you're going to get is
wrong things.


No comments: