RUDIMENTS, pt. 91
Making Cars
I guess I'd have to say most of my
time was spent finding place. There
were some hundred 'different' ones,
and after a while it just became a
form of role-playing. I felt like any
stupid rock-star or personality would
feel, making it all up as I went along,
to different audiences; seeking and
finding something to cling to while
yet keeping and holding to my own,
sorely-won, personal precepts. I was
adrift in a new and different world.
Most
men of assumptions speak
first, think only later. It's not as
difficult as it
may seem - in fact
it's easier for the herd, at most a
moment's displeasure. I have tried
in a million ways to go over and
over the
things of all my days,
and what's left is a startling mass
of moments -
things piled up
which only now I sift through
and find many of those working
'assumptions' which went with
them still fighting to get out.
But I've overcome
a lot of that
- believe me, truly overcome.
As I turn my mind
inward it
seems that each particularity of
what I'd been brought up with
had
been false or at least false
to the effect that it first demanded
the adoption
of false premises by
which it was undergirded. And
none of that has ever
stopped, only
gotten worse. Because of it, I have
a million enemies, not people, but
demons,
spectres which still haunt.
I admit to that
- but I also own
up to the fact
that my own life has
been a constant re-alignment of these
things. All the
usual psychological
components of clinical behavior,
perhaps, but one of 'those' people,
I'm not (psychology types [see
'How I Began Writing Drama']). I
was brought up - rather distastefully
- in a
home with an atmosphere where
there was
not much of anything except
sentiment. It was an 'Italian Catholic'
milieu, if
those nettlesome words
need be applied. But it was way
more than that. It was
two people
(my parents) yet embroiled in their
own overwhelming adventures and
personal sometimes almost horrific
scenes, trying to get through all of
that but having
to ignore most of
the 'real' aspects of that as they
pressed in. There was
never any
self-reflection or rejection
- they
bought into and went along
with
all of what they'd been somehow
presented with as the right way
and the
correct route. There are
millions of ways to interpret a
rejectionist's life.
They had both
been rejected, for sure. A rejectionist
is someone trying to
fight their way
out of the middle of vast confusion,
but having or allowing no
other
means to do so except by reaction.
They sought after no learning, they
delved after no deeper threads. They
accepted the life they'd been handed
as
being of a part and parcel with
'tradition'
- a tradition of racial
characteristics, old European
geography. They considered it
all valid. What a
'rejectionist' never
realizes is that the 'society' they're
so set after
achieving does not want
them - spews them out like dirt,
in turn only
rejects them again -
messes with their heads, takes
their money
hand over foot,
breaks up their time with rules
and regulations, sessions of
this
and that, calendar blocks of time,
scheduled plans, boilerplate formats
of
social and political belief; all while
convincing them that this is not so.
-
Society aims to make a bureaucrat
out of each and every person. They
are always confused, not
knowing
where to turn. Not realizing there
is nowhere to turn except within.
And within equals the Kierkegaardian
sense of dread and fury and might :
the
decisiveness of singularity.
Singularity must be achieved first.
ahead
of and before anything else
- because it
invalidates any and all
of the previous characteristics I've
just mentioned,
which are merely
the characteristics of control and
duplicitous autocracy. A
Dictatorship
of the Ridiculous Folly. Politics is
certainly not the answer -
though
those who profit from politics try
with all their might to drag
you in
and think that it is. Consumerism
is not the answer -
that's more
control and more uselessness.
Having a good time, being
entertained, is not the answer -
though that's mostly all of what's
thrown at you : inanity, idiocy,
stupidity, race,
sex, perversion,
acceptance. You are given no
choice except the societal choice of
going along. My parents, helpless
as they were - nay,
primitive as
they were - were more like
cave-people in a diorama
within
some deep and dank museum
somewhere, wondering what
that distant thing
called 'fire'
was that they'd glimpsed; still
painting their own frail pictures
on dark cave walls, they were
yet set adrift, lost and functioning
slightly on
the tundra and the
plains and steppes of a brave new
world, to them. But, like
so, so
many others, even today, they
never made the leap, found the
manner by
which to surpass,
to best and overcome, all that
was holding them down. The
one,
vast myth of empowerment and
overcoming, which was presented
to them and
which they readily
accepted, was more control and
regulation and stipulation in
the
mega-guise of 'Absolutes'. The
bifurcation of their lives had
been broken
down into the two
absolutes - the sacred or the
profane, the secular and
the
religious - as if there was to
be any difference at all.
They
bought into all of this, each
delicious but foul and poisonous
morsel.
Somewhere in the midst
of this, came I. It's been said in
magical circles that
we only know
a minute portion of reality, that
we are greater and grander than
anything we can imagine, and
that we 'choose' our family and
situation for the
psychic-adventure
values they will bring us - all known
about beforehand, all
readied for,
and all accepted previously. No
undue surprises, just what I've
always termed, in my years of writing,
'Lesson Learning Catching Up With
Itself.' That's worked for me. Perhaps
then, if we choose it, I had chosen this
thin branch on which to try a stand.
Who knows? And I'll never know,
because
it's part and parcel of the
doing, the not-knowing. I came,
I somehow survived,
and I got
here. All of my steps were put
before me - of
which you've been
reading some here. Infancy as a
blur, a muddle, a story-line
repeated
back to me. I know nothing of it.
small, internalized
memories I
may have of things, start well after
that - the
scrapbooked reality of
infancy and toddler years somehow
muddied or yet
blurred, if ever there
at all. Maybe it's waiting to pounce
back at me and all recur
in those
famed 'reviews' of the last moments
of Life - on
the way out, a distant
movie for the final flight. Language
becomes the gift the never stops giving,
though devilish as it is it can
destroy
as well. In my parents' household, in
Avenel, in fact, language was a
stepchild
of nothing at all. No care was taken,
nor given, to words, nor to the
structure
of things to which words can lead
-
the articulation of ideas and
internality,
the revocation of the 'rejectionism'
fabric so easily accepted. My
house,
the place in which I was raised, only
had language as utility and
message
- the to-do's and whens and hows of
things.
Many people commented upon
my father's brawn, his muscularity -
back
then -
and how he got things
done; throwing spadefuls of dirt
around, cutting
wood, building things,
altering the 'scape, as it were. That
was, for his time,
his own communion
with the world - though unknown
to him. His physicality was
his
response somehow to the void.
The nagging void of the absence
of language.
There was nothing
finer than base. Hammers, saws,
dirt, chisels, concrete and
lumber.
It was all of one contingent. When
he was up against the opposite of
that -
as I mentioned long ago,
those neighbors who walked home
from the
trains, with their overcoats
and briefcases and tophats (few those
these
neighbors were) he harbored
anxiety, professed a hatred, swore
off them and
their effete ways. It was
instant, the response didn't even take
a minute to
boil before brimming over.
I always thought of it as his reaction
to language,
or against language.
Stupid on my part,
yes, but as a
ten year old, or whatever, what else
was I to condition my response
as?
He wanted me to be like him? In his
revolt and festering anger at the
scenes around him, he sought to
duplicate me into another version
of him -
shouting down or
belaboring points of distinction
between 'world' and
'theory'. To
him, the world was this harsh
terrain he dealt in. To
him, the
'others' represented theory
-
those who did not dig and cut
and struggle and fight. You may
not understand or agree with
what I'm stating
here, but through
the eyes of 'me', the representative
atom in this quest of
self, that's what
it always appeared as. To fight back,
my father would
build -
massively
overbuilt things, yes, but he built.
Piles of lumber turned
into cornices
and shevles and alcoves. Sheds and
doorways. Cellar entrances and
overhangs and eaves and shelters.
Fences. In somewhat a fury, he
built
single-handidly back-room
extensions, six-room attics, complete
hallways and
cedar closets. It just
went on. He simply translated the
world into 'things'. I
was speechless,
mostly, never knowing what to say
-
certainly not to offer an object-lesson
in alternatives. By age eleven
or twelve,
there was no real alternative for me
but to leave. I had to get out
of the
stifling atmosphere which had put
me here, showing no alternatives,
allowing nothing else. I did not want
that form of life. Simply knew I did
not. My reality I'd already
encrypted,
and it included (already, early on)
words and books and booklets and
information and writing, colors and
forms, finesse and gradation. I was
up
against a solid wall, totally, and
I knew it. A writer named Mary Jo
Bang put
it like this once : 'It's like
sleep if sleep were a film that didn't
include
you, but no, whatever is
happening, you are always in it,
the indispensible
point of view.'
-
I
think it all has to do with what
you care to believe; from top to
bottom,
that's the essential point.
It just goes on from there. Here's
a for-instance
in, even, the present
day : start of Autumn, ten million
morons, in the name of
their
'ecology' awareness and drive,
raking leaves, endlessly blowing
them,
noisily piling them with
enormous leaf-blowers, hiring
endless landscape
companies
with marginal employees slaving
away to keep yards cleared and
looking perfectly serene. It's a
mad-person's paradise, of course,
totally off
the wall, and un-natural
as all get out. The leaves are meant
to fall,
decompose, become the
composted and enriched soil for
the future, the loam of Nature's
own love. Yet, having
been
propagandized into believing
they only do what they must do
-
these people expend more energy,
at every level, in order to
'supposedly'
reach their end-results of a clean
ecology - it's
asinine. Leaf bags,
replete with company names printed
on them, corporate
monster hardware
names and not, are left at curbside
for municipal pick-up. The leaf
bags themselves
are an entire
other industry, complete with
the processes of the printing
and
gluing which goes on to make
them - an industry which uses
endless resources,
mechanical and
fuel, transport trucks, distribution,
etc. Then the municipal
trucks and
fuel, and wages, which go into the
pick-up and drop-off collection
places. The endless fuel
and travel
exploits of the huge landscape
trucks, the noise and energy use
of
the mechanical blowers - etc.,
etc. I'll stop there. Suffice it to
say,
without even a thought, this
endeavor is everywhere undertaken
in the name
of 'ecology' and 'green'
recycling, etc., etc. No one thinks.
They all accept,
and just go on
about their merry, stinking ways.
It's all a belief system
adopted,
and never thought about again.
No comments:
Post a Comment