RUDIMENTS, pt. 101
Making Cars
There was a while there, into
the early 1990's, when the early
growth of computer companies
was a really hot thing. Stock
prices doubling every two years,
with splits and spin-offs. Some
of those early names are gone now,
like Compaq and others. One time,
at a client's place, an insurance
company, Sovereign, in Edison/Iselin,
along Route One, I arrived just in
time to watch as the hallways were
being filled up, right off the large
tractor-trailer delivering them, with
probably 70 or so brand new, boxed
Gateway computers (they had a
very recognizable, black/white
cowhide logo motif broadly printed
on all their crates and boxes). Of course,
seeing that, I went and purchased 50
shares of Gateway stock. It, along
with Dell, Compaq, and even Intel,
which made the microchips inside
most of these units. It was sure some
high-flying time, and those prices took
off. Of course, they also plateau'd, and
fell too. Gateway is gone. Compaq as
well, and Intel I don't know about.
Dell ended up the big winner, but they
too have faded now, all these years later.
The things about tech stocks and all the
breaking and leading edge stuff which
goes with it, is that it flies, for a while,
and then everything else catches up
to it. Just like Apple, like Microsoft.
With all of that, a person could have
gone crazy chasing each new little
whim and rumor. I never did any
of that; instead I stayed light, watched
carefully and then cut and run. Nowadays
you can run open accounts with, say,
T. G. Edwards or Ameritrade, and plunk
in your own trades at 7 bucks a trade,
and keep a trade account with them as
well. I was stone-age by comparison,
and it was at 60 bucks a shot for a
trade, buy, and sell too. So I was never
really trigger-happy. One guy told me
to just make sure I get the original
prices back, say a $3000 trade, and
once that return was made, on each
company, sell enough to get that
return, and whatever was left, being
gravy, just keep it there, for years if
that's what it takes, and just let it keep
appreciating, growing in value. That's
psychological reasoning talking - and
the average 'investor' at this level, I
found, never worked that way; they
wanted a much more instant gratification,
couldn't much wait for anything, and
wanted returns. Even bragging rights.
I started seeing, right off, that I wasn't
the sort to ride it in any way seriously,
and it meant too little too me, plus
I detested all the tax crap - every little
piece of paperwork and tax form, returns,
their portion of 'short term capital gains,'
etc. I said to myself, 'I thought you were
more than all that crap? What's going on?'
I was right.
-
To tell you the truth, the biggest thrill I
ever got from any of this was - I chose to
do it all in person, not my mail or broker -
when there were splits or buy-outs, or
companies were sold or spun-off, and
new ones created, you'd get this form in
the mail to surrender the stock certificates
the mail to surrender the stock certificates
(no longer done this way), turning in the
old ones, getting new ones, new share
assignments, etc. That probably happened,
in 8 years or so, about 12 times. The biggest
thing I did was - and I loved it - going right
down to Wall Street, to the exchange window,
with ID, certificates, and all, and at this little
bank-teller-like window, frosted glass, small
lamp, pens, pencil, money and change-till,
turning all this stuff in in person, to the
real, live, exchange agent at the other side
of the glass. It was all so very cool; almost
shabby too, like an OTB parlor betting
window, but marble and stone, and there
was even a rent-a-guard kind of security
presence in the little lobbies and doorways.
I'd go in with one set of document or
certificates and - waiting 20 minutes or
so - leave with a whole other set. Felt like
a regular Rockefeller. Well, irregular.
-
I used to watch for the monthly GNP (gross
national product) figures, rates, productivity,
all that crap. International Harvester, which
later became Navistar, or some stupid name,
always reacted well when the economy was
positive (farm and equipment needs going
up) so I'd buy some of that. At those early
days, as well, America OnLine was always
a big mover. It too faded and, as AOL, I
recall, was actually bought by Dell, for a
while anyway. And Home Depot, and
Staples. These were all, at one time, each
fierce and energetic companies to buy.
All sorts of really stupid things - turning
real life into the pale, asshole expectation
of dollars and sense, and hoping to have
it pay off. So senseless, and divorced
from reality. But it was, for a while,
almost a sport for me. There was/is an
oil-equipment and drilling company,
named Halliburton, that was another
reflexive mover on economic figures
- oil prices, futures, drilling starts,
etc. That started at about 32 dollar a
share, maybe 4 splits ago. There was
a good, oil-industry ride with them.
Losers? Most any airline stock went
to Hell, as did the America Auto
Company stocks; Ford, GM, etc. Bad
bets each. In fact, all that old-industry
stuff is dead meat. Another funny thing
was, back in those days, constantly
gaining, making money each day,
was this crazy company, trading here,
but a Mexican company to which
everyone was jumping - 'Telephonos
de Mexico' (pronounced by the radio
voice 'Mehico'). Fact is, crazy as it was,
growth industry for sure, in the late
eighties, they were only just then wiring
Mexico for telephones and wire-service.
-
Now I'm going to talk experience here:
the background buzz to all this stocks
and bonds stuff, supposedly so 'American
Republic' and authentic; the Buttonwood
tree, under which the original outdoor
trades were done and proclaimed, it's
all bullshit and a grand, mythic lie.
The grand, mythic lie underlying all
of if it, is, of course, that any little
guy, a you or a me, can step in and
take part in and reap the benefits of,
the grand capitalist system with allows
public ownership and sharing of profits
and proceeds - through quarterly dividends
and more. In this vein, it even, through
stockholder voice, etc. allows the influencing
of product and procedure. (Those wishing,
by the way, to buy a bridge should please
line up to my right, and I'll be with you
shortly). In no way, shape, or form is
any of this true. The individual investor
is a short-eyed loser, especially in these
days of computerized, programmed-trades,
flash buys and sells, great blocs of
pension-fund and such moneys, by
huge insurance companies, brokerage
firms, industry-protectors, etc. These
organized trading operations not only
buy and sell in blocs that influence
everything, and in huge numbers,
they also set and determine and
influence their own markets by
timed-buys, insider information,
trade-offs, and the corrupt
mechanization of laws, process,
hearings, and legislative goals.
Overnight buys, after-hour trades,
international exchanges and
determinants - (they can lose 10
millions at 4pm in NYC, so as to
gain it back, with an additional
5 millions aggressed and achieved,
in the Tokyo Market at 1am. All those
little guys, in their pajamas, at home,
at midnight, swiping their trades and
buys and 200 share blocs, they don't
stand a chance. Nor does the fool
lunging in for hot IPO's (initial
public offerings) - companies with
a product first going public, for
shareholders (money). Those are
priced, say, for the average sucker,
at 26 bucks a share. The stooges line
up, but they're never sold for that,
starting instead at like 34 'because
of demand,' while all the insiders,
sycophants, deal-makers and institutions,
already have their millions of shares
guaranteed for 16 bucks a share. They
all walk away at the end of the week,
millionaires, then dump their initial
shares high, thereby depressing the stock
value down way under initial pricing,
and they buy back again, raising, as it
and they buy back again, raising, as it
were their own bar. It's a racket. As is
the country as a whole - senators and
representatives, they all get their personal
and staff pre-notification, and buy in,
smiling, while supposing, as well, to
regulate all this crap. In addition, let me
add, my own personal broker guy, he'd
call me once or twice a month too, with 'tips'
on upcoming deals and developments he'd
'recommend' I buy in on now, before it broke.
He was pre-notifying me, you see, of a
stock he'd become, through his firm, a
'market-maker' on. I'd be able to buy in
early, and he'd get a cut for pre-selling.
Now, about the bridge, here's the deal...
and staff pre-notification, and buy in,
smiling, while supposing, as well, to
regulate all this crap. In addition, let me
add, my own personal broker guy, he'd
call me once or twice a month too, with 'tips'
on upcoming deals and developments he'd
'recommend' I buy in on now, before it broke.
He was pre-notifying me, you see, of a
stock he'd become, through his firm, a
'market-maker' on. I'd be able to buy in
early, and he'd get a cut for pre-selling.
Now, about the bridge, here's the deal...
-
You know, back when all this first got
so out of hand that it had to be controlled,
the President way back created the SEC
(Securities and Exchange Commission)
to take hold and control all this rank
crookedness. You know who he put
in charge as the very first Chairman?
The biggest crook in America at
that time. Joseph P. Kennedy.
No comments:
Post a Comment