RUDIMENTS, pt. 653
(run this by me again?)
I never had any of that
(run this by me again?)
I never had any of that
licentious stuff going on :
Mistresses, lovers, girlfriends,
any of that. My version of all
that was just to fall off deep
into some private and singular
string of personal consciousness
and stay there. Get distant.
Alienate others. It always
worked for me, and I managed
to get things done too. None of
it probably helped my reputation
much, for whatever it was. Others
just stayed wary. Good enough.
It still seemed people were
always coming to me with one
problem or request or another.
I always seemed to get into that
same position of 'fixer' or guru
to others - seeking solutions,
deals, or just wanting to air some
thoughts. I, by those means, very
often got deeply into the lives
of others - kind of completely
opposite to what it was I originally
intended. Weird.
-
It's always been, in my life,
that I can be running along fine,
and then some little, dumb, thing
will trip me up. Like burning my
tongue, or some little ache or pain,
anything like that, even smashing up
a fingernail, say. It's the darnedest
thing how a tiny nothing can set
me off. I used to have a friend,
he's dead now, who was whatever
it's called when everything has to
be perfectly positioned. If a person
even walked by his desk, he'd go
over this whole crazy ritual, as
soon as the talk or whatever was
done, of repositioning everything,
and I mean everything, at the
desktop. Each item had to be
confirmed once more as being
in their correct and rightful spot:
Paperclips, the tape dispenser,
pens, paper, this and that, it all
went on. He really meant his
stuff, and when he got into one
of those tizzies I'd just walk away.
I'd seen one or two people over
time with other things, like facial
tics, or stuttering. But this took
it all - it was real, and it was
purely physical. As a kid, right
there on Inman Avenue, I had
two boyhood chums (yikes, can
you imagine, they too are BOTH
dead!), one would smell everything.
Just what I said; he'd pick up a
TV Guide, if he passed it, or a
kid-toy or a trinket or a sofa
pillow, really, and he'd sniff it.
Just for a second, totally self
absorbed in that act, and then it
would be placed back down. But,
hey, that was weird! And the
second friend, right across the
street, Jimmy, he had that even
more bizarre thing for a few
years (I don't know if these traits
disappeared later, because I knew
neither of them as adults) of
saying something - anything,
'I just had lunch, and it was good,'
and then, in some oddball sort of
review, or examination of what he'd
just said, he'd silently mouth it again,
repeating it to himself, as if to be
sure there hadn't been a mistake -
like writing a line of words, and
then re-reading to edit. That was
completely bonkers too, I thought.
-
I never knew, or know, what happens
with things like these instances; even
the stuttering guy, that too over time
did all disappear, but it used to be
brutal, like torture, to witness. How
is it that individuals, each separately,
get to walk through periods of time
with their own, of these, little
defining quirks? We learn and see
them by the effect, and in that way
remember them, forever. So very
strange. What other defining
aspects of ourselves, I'd wonder,
became the fixed apparitions of
what people remember about us?
-
There used to be a guy, a sort of
busboy I guess - at 'Romeo's'
on 42nd street. It was a sort of
super-glorified, deep pizza place
where you could get a plate of
spaghetti for a quarter. (1966).
People would sit around, there
was a serving window kind of
thing at street-side, but it was
little bothered with. This busboy
guy was a large, mis-shapen,
white-aproned black guy, who
would stare and shuffle around,
taking people's plates and settings
and dumping the things into a
wheel cart with a large plastic
tub on top. Sometimes too he'd
bring things out to people; a
plate of food or some slices.
That was never too cool to
see, because he was a bit
messy, and strange, and was,
as well, constantly handling old
plates and trays and leftovers,
plus mops and sweep-ups and
the rest. Nobody really seemed
to mind, not even me, though
I'd notice it, and it all just went
on. He was always mumbling
or seemingly uttering something
to himself - large teeth, a little
bucked, and a mouth that didn't
seem to close correctly, because
of the teeth, I thought. He became,
for me and my 2 friends, the
defining character to this odd
'Romeo's' place - which only
disappeared about 12 years ago.
It was funny like that - I made
eye contact lots of times with
him, but nothing ever came of it,
no communication, and no
acknowledgement. It was strange,
amid all that cranking bustle, to
get to that point of 'just almost'
clicking with someone but not.
One of my friends, Jack, the
later Vietnam Medic guy, he
was always breaking his glasses,
and there was a dollar-fifty
eyeglass frame place near there.
Because of that great bargain,
we were there a lot; after that
we just went for the cheap plate
of food. When you're hungry you
don't really have too see to eat?
-
Let me point out, again, that this
was all old days stuff ; the 42nd
street of 1966 bore no resemblance
to what pretzel-palace of lights
and gimmickry that's there now.
Back then, nothing had yet been
redone - no updates, no new
buildings, no real attractions.
Strings and rows of sleazeball
porno-palaces, of the old school;
a few playland-like places of
ski-ball, ring tosses, photo-booths,
and all that; first run movie places
with the big attractions - all
that Ben-Hur and Klute-like stuff.
Morgan! Georgie Girl! The Graduate!
You name it, it was around. In addition,
there were the pimps, whores, gigolos,
queers, dykes, homos, and sexual
deviants of any stripe, even the most
normal, prowling around. Nuns,
with crotchless panties, as it were.
Nothing you'd ever expect. Militant
black guys, seeking to sell you their
papers. A few, and only a few, cops.
There would always be clutches of
suburban kids, off the trains and
buses, maybe, seeking excitement,
maturity or wonderment to take back
home with them, so they too could
slog through another week at some
stupid 'William J. Madison IV
High School.' It was all misery.
-
Suffice it to say there wasn't too much
legit business going on along that
street. If you were able to find a tax
accountant, or a CPA, or a lawyer in
some walk-up cubbyhole along that
street, suffice it again to say that
that Myron Cohen was crooked.
-
Fact is. I've always done too much
thinking. The whole communal
ethos of that lame street was always
too much for me; Romeo's cheap
food notwithstanding. I always
felt I was being betrayed. Back some
time ago, there was this sociologist
or something, last name Boehm, and
he wrote some interesting stiff about
'society' : 'Modern society reduced the
role of communality, and as it did so
it elevated the role of Authority.' In
his studies of older, communal
societies, he found that one of the
most common traits was the absence
of major wealth disparities between
individuals. Another was the absence
of arbitrary authority. 'Social life
is politically egalitarian in that there
is always a low tolerance by a group's
mature males for one of their numbers
dominating, bossing, or denigrating
the others...probably as a result of
hunting large game, which required
cooperative band-level sharing of meat.
Their mobility, as well, made the
shifting communities difficult to
have authority impose on the
unwilling. Males trying to take over
the group were countered by other
males, in coalitions of harsh
resistance. 'Failure to share' was one
of the big three 'infractions' along with
murder and theft. Freeloading on
others, and bullying, were also high
up on the list - punishments included
public ridicule, shunning, and, finally,
assassination of the culprit by the
entire group. A cave painting from
the early Holocene in Spain shows
ten figures with bows in their hands
and a lone figure on the ground with
what appear to be ten arrows sticking
out of him. The configuration portrays
execution, not death in combat.
Boehm also said 'current-day
foraging groups still have group
execution as the most common way
of punishing males who try to claim
a disproportionate amount of the
group's resources.' He then runs this
thought out as follows: 'In old societies
a person couldn't get away with selfish
behavior because people lived in small
groups where almost everything was
open to scrutiny. Modern society, on the
other hand, is a sprawling and anonymous
mess where people can get away with
enormous amounts of dishonesty
without getting caught : cheating,
insurance fraud, unemployment and
benefits cheating, etc. - most strenuously
including Medicare, Medicade, and
claims of disability. Westerners now
live in societies where scamming small
amounts of money at the bottom are
almost endless, and hard to catch. But
scamming large amounts of money
off the top is even harder to catch.
Systems are built for this. Most tribal
and subsistence level societies would
inflict severe penalties on anyone caught
undertaking such things. Hunter-gatherers
would treat their version of a welfare or
disability cheat, or a dishonest banker,
as decisively and with the same finality
as cheaters or cowards, the modern-day
equivalent of tribe members who
quietly steal more than their share of
meat or other resources.' Think about
that the next time you're standing
in today's equivalent of Romeo's, or
a courthouse, or a town hall.
-
Suffice it to say there wasn't too much
legit business going on along that
street. If you were able to find a tax
accountant, or a CPA, or a lawyer in
some walk-up cubbyhole along that
street, suffice it again to say that
that Myron Cohen was crooked.
-
Fact is. I've always done too much
thinking. The whole communal
ethos of that lame street was always
too much for me; Romeo's cheap
food notwithstanding. I always
felt I was being betrayed. Back some
time ago, there was this sociologist
or something, last name Boehm, and
he wrote some interesting stiff about
'society' : 'Modern society reduced the
role of communality, and as it did so
it elevated the role of Authority.' In
his studies of older, communal
societies, he found that one of the
most common traits was the absence
of major wealth disparities between
individuals. Another was the absence
of arbitrary authority. 'Social life
is politically egalitarian in that there
is always a low tolerance by a group's
mature males for one of their numbers
dominating, bossing, or denigrating
the others...probably as a result of
hunting large game, which required
cooperative band-level sharing of meat.
Their mobility, as well, made the
shifting communities difficult to
have authority impose on the
unwilling. Males trying to take over
the group were countered by other
males, in coalitions of harsh
resistance. 'Failure to share' was one
of the big three 'infractions' along with
murder and theft. Freeloading on
others, and bullying, were also high
up on the list - punishments included
public ridicule, shunning, and, finally,
assassination of the culprit by the
entire group. A cave painting from
the early Holocene in Spain shows
ten figures with bows in their hands
and a lone figure on the ground with
what appear to be ten arrows sticking
out of him. The configuration portrays
execution, not death in combat.
Boehm also said 'current-day
foraging groups still have group
execution as the most common way
of punishing males who try to claim
a disproportionate amount of the
group's resources.' He then runs this
thought out as follows: 'In old societies
a person couldn't get away with selfish
behavior because people lived in small
groups where almost everything was
open to scrutiny. Modern society, on the
other hand, is a sprawling and anonymous
mess where people can get away with
enormous amounts of dishonesty
without getting caught : cheating,
insurance fraud, unemployment and
benefits cheating, etc. - most strenuously
including Medicare, Medicade, and
claims of disability. Westerners now
live in societies where scamming small
amounts of money at the bottom are
almost endless, and hard to catch. But
scamming large amounts of money
off the top is even harder to catch.
Systems are built for this. Most tribal
and subsistence level societies would
inflict severe penalties on anyone caught
undertaking such things. Hunter-gatherers
would treat their version of a welfare or
disability cheat, or a dishonest banker,
as decisively and with the same finality
as cheaters or cowards, the modern-day
equivalent of tribe members who
quietly steal more than their share of
meat or other resources.' Think about
that the next time you're standing
in today's equivalent of Romeo's, or
a courthouse, or a town hall.
No comments:
Post a Comment