Saturday, November 30, 2019

12,339. RUDIMENTS, pt. 885

RUDIMENTS, pt. 885
(watching a plane fly over a golden loom)
I early on learned never to
feed any angry animal. They
are just waiting for that and,
Zap!, there goes your hand.
So I just ignore the anger,
though it makes me sad for
them. For not being me.
I guess. In order to make
due compensation for
shortcomings, some people
really bend the twig.
-
I always like to visit the
Philadelphia Navy Yard. Like
the one in Brooklyn, the actual
'Navy' glory days of it are over,
but remnants abound, as well
as do an assortment of old
mothballed ships and parts of
some old fleet. The remnants
of everything just sit about
in the water; nothing doing
much of anything. There are
cool things around, like the
Commander's house and officers'
housing, an old chapel, and
a bell tower that used to peal
for deaths and funerals. And
messages too. Trouble at sea.
People lost. Disasters, or
arrivals. There's also a
mariner's church like that
in lower Manhattan, on the
fringe now of Chinatown, by
Municipal Hall, and you can
see the huge old bell that once
used to peal for incoming and
docking ship-arrivals. Men
home to port after months,
or a year, at sea  -  the old
freighters from Liverpool
or Marseilles. None of that
goes on anymore, so pretty
much we just don't know
about it. The entirety of the
Philadelphia place now, the
working parts of it anyway,
is now turned over to a clean,
official, corporate use  -. new
buildings rimming the property,
the little clutch of lunchtime
office workers strolling the
waterfront, old guys sitting
around fishing while they stare
out, across the water, to jersey
and environs.  We live now in
the aftermath of a million things
we'll never get to experience.
-
The Brooklyn Navy Yard,
grittier and a bit more harsh,
has too, in its way, been turned
over to that sort of art and artisan
kind of place  -  studios and
galleries, jewelry makers and
artisan bakers. There too, history
and its ghosts abound, but it's all
kept pretty silent, except for the
usual plaques and legends. It's
kept busy with trucks and
loading docks, which doesn't
happen in the Philadelphia one.
I winder often what the present
day communication is between
them, if any, against how, I'd
imagine, the sort of tight and
steady communication they
once must have kept. It seems
as if it would have been
imperative; different world
and all that. That difference
is encapsulated fairly well
at the Philadelphia location 
too, so near the airport which,
in so many ways, has supplanted
it and all it once represented.
Now a viewer can stand there,
all afternoon, near the gigantic
old abandoned ships, and stare
skyward to watch the jets come
and go instead. It's sort of a
map overlap of two different
spatial levels of reality, where
they (almost) intersect as one
covers over the other. Maybe a
'book' against an 'audio-book'
best shows the contrast I'm
meaning. It's a bit like the
older reality of 'what was'  -  
a more quaint society of ships
and silence? "Today we think
of reading as a private, solitary
activity: you have a book and
an electric light. But, in say, 
1855, reading was most often a
communal, semi-public, activity.
Books and lighting were both
costly, and homes were lit by
gas lamps, oil lanterns, or by
candlelight.  For all but the
wealthy, evening reading took
place aloud, from a shared book,
with family members seated
around a shared light source,
at what was called the 'family
table.' Even when people brought
their own books to the shared
lantern or gas lamp, others could
monitor their reading. men of
the nineteenth century were
supposed to control the reading
of women, servants, and minors
who lived with them.' (Naomi
Wolf, 'Outrages'). So, in whichever
pose you which to take this, it's a
soft form of the communal militarism 
that's outdated itself right before our
eyes. Once waterways and harbors
were airtight and ultra-important.
Now, everything travels by
roadway, and nobody cares about
the rest. The commonality of
everything is shot, and the world
has dispersed itself. Monads,
all over again, Mr. Leibniz.
-
I had a discussion today with
someone  -  I'd asked them to
please tell me the story of
Rumpelstiltskin. It went pretty
well, along into the tale, until
she realized that, maybe, she
was mixing it up, and blending
it in with, Rapunzel. A baby,
in utero; if you don't guess my
name the baby becomes mine;
Rumpelstiltskin gets the baby;
puts her to work for life at a
loom weaving gold; I interjected
here about the passage of time;
no answer forthcoming  -  an 
infant leaps time, to be a
proficient weaver, at a golden
loom? Nothing else has 
happened? Rapunzel lets 
down her hair, (?) the baby 
overhears Rumpelstiltskin,
runs and tells the father (still
alive? Not dead from the
passage of all this time?....
And that was it. It seems like 
even fairy tales can dispense 
with the sense of time. We can't. 
All that old stuff, forgotten, mixed
up. unknown. How does time
pass in a fairy tale? Watching 
a plane fly over a golden loom.

No comments: