RUDIMENTS, pt. 733
(maybe god only knows)
Faking out the beach scene
in Belmar wasn't that much
fun. Being freezing cold didn't
help but, at the same time, in
the first week of March it's
not much other than a cozy
nowhere, if you live there,
and not many do. At least
along that cold, blowy area of
bungalow beach front. (I go
back there now, and most all
of the old shore bungalows
are gone - a few coastal
storms, a few floods, new
people, complete re-builds.
Much of it has been replaced by
neat, in-a-row, beach homes.
Much of it has been replaced by
neat, in-a-row, beach homes.
The bars and crap-houses
still dot the roadway, Ocean
Ave. or whatever it's called,
and the streets with the low
numbers still run down. 7th,
6th, 5th, etc. Logical and
boring as anywhere else.
It's not like, or wasn't like,
being in sort of the same
boat in NYC. My mind
tried that connection. It
didn't work. As Gertrude
Stein had it about Oakland,
there's no 'there' there. The
whole idea of Summer sports
and Summer frolic - the
guts and games of girls and
boys on the beaches and at
the bars, never meant anything
to me at all. In fact, I couldn't
stand all that crap - noise,
sand, crummy food, banners,
bells, waves, the posturing
people and their piccolo
patterns. There never seemed
anything real about that life
at all - you could have your
keno games, Ski-Ball,
Sno-Cones and Frosties
and the rest. The whole
thing was a waste.
-
Much like along the bottom
of Manhattan, at what's called
the 'Battery' - oddly enough - to
(speak anew of John and batteries)
(speak anew of John and batteries)
people come to look, to stare,
out to sea; watching the works
of the harbor, etc. Well, they
used to. It's more difficult today
with the commercial development
of everything, new masses of
people, and the hordes now of
tourists and tourist amenities
everywhere, as well as tour
lines, boat tours, Statue of
Liberty stuff, and all the rest.
Most of that old Melville sort
of feel and solitariness is
gone now - masses and groups
all proclaim their hallelujahs
while they worship the dollar.
while they worship the dollar.
Trying the same thing in
Belmar, also, maybe, once
long before, could have been
a righteous experience too.
But the Jersey shore, for the
most of it, has long ago
succumbed to the plague
of nettlesome frolic. I don't
think anyone really these
days stares out and thinks.
I'm not sure they stare out.
I'm also not sure they think.
But what stuck in my craw
the most was the wide
misunderstanding and the
misrepresenting of the whole
scene itself. The shore area
was portrayed as a dark, fetid
area of crime, drugs, and unseen
dangers. I guess it all might very
well be true, but is that any reason
to portray the negatives and the
undesirable aspects, just to turn
some movie-coin for mostly
dim-witted studio investors?
Who otherwise mostly didn't
know what they were even
talking about in mixing up the
two : porno-biker-fantasy-babes,
drugs, low-life sluggos, and
creepy-crawly thugs on midnight
motorcycles. It was all a sham.
And in some awful aspect of it
I had become a part-time sham
master, voiding my waste into
what they offered which was,
essentially, the promise of
ridicule, and free food.
-
'Badda-boom, badda-bing,'
as they used to say in the mob.
But there's no mob in Belmar.
Right? Ha. Ha. John had better
be wary of the things he touches.
If 'Sal' is watching and really
wants his batteries, anything
could happen. In this movie,
by the way, the Bikers were
portrayed as users, buyers, and
sellers of this new super drug
hallucinogen called 'chew' -
dumbest name in the world;
but then no dumber than having
a film named Fathers and Sons,
and hoping people don't think
of Turgenev (don't worry, they
won't). Ivan Turgenev, in 1865,
wrote his own Fathers and Sons.
If this film was meant in any
way to resound with some echo
of that, it too failed. The kids
portrayed in this movie would
chomp on this stuff and turn
immediately to idiot-zombies.
That's a pretty good summation,
in a quick instant, for the entire
society it was supposed to be
addressing itself.
-
It was all too easy to take any
of this serious. It was too cold,
too cheap, too sleazy to be real.
It couldn't have had any sense.
The fortune-teller lady as presented
was an idiot, who couldn't tell the
moon from the spoon, nor the
cow that ran away with it. However
that is. Jeff Goldblum, supposedly
in the film an avid runner and
jogger, ran the boardwalk boards
with the gentle, toned step of a
female. There's one scene, later
on, by the Biker scene, where he's
punching some dweeby troublesome
creep, on the beach sand. He punches
as if his arm is disconnected from
his body. It's a visual nightmare.
The whole thing was. The female
co-lead, the one John had tried
jumping, in the trailer, looked
fatuous and already broken.
And God only knows what she
had to do, poor girl, to get the
role, bad as it was. I hope God
knows anyway, because I don't.
-
The main point is that the entire
idea of having Bikers on the beach
was an add-on. Just a way to lend
some attractive low-life culture
to the film and maybe draw some
extra people in. I think it failed
miserably anyway. But, in any case,
there was no justice, no meaning, no
need for the biker contingent to be
presented and then simply dropped,
like some bad background noise, once
the movie's 'reconciliation' takes place,
between father and son. It has nothing
to do with the dropped bikers in any
way, and could just as well have been
set in a priest's home or a YMCA camp.
As it is, I seem to recall the 'reconciliation'
coming down to the reasoning that the
father can now 'scramble' some eggs, and
they can have their father-son breakfast
together, while the rest of the world rots,
the bad-boy Bikers and their drugs still
on the loose. The miserable Biker-den still
there and tolerated. Who owns it? Some
slum landlord who cares nothing for
the tenants? What's a Biker den anyway?
Who lives there? What goes on? Are there
neighbors? No cops? I would think, true
to 'Justice' and uplift, there'd have been a
classier denouement and a better serve
to Justice if, in some Easy Rider sense,
the Bikers had been slain, or the house
blown up, or the Justice of the day took
place. Well, maybe it did - that justice
being false, artificial, and do-nothing.
But no real ends were served. It too was
all a sham. The same rotten world is
left in place. Hey, Jim Jarmusch, next
time, don't call me. I'll call you.
-
The main point is that the entire
idea of having Bikers on the beach
was an add-on. Just a way to lend
some attractive low-life culture
to the film and maybe draw some
extra people in. I think it failed
miserably anyway. But, in any case,
there was no justice, no meaning, no
need for the biker contingent to be
presented and then simply dropped,
like some bad background noise, once
the movie's 'reconciliation' takes place,
between father and son. It has nothing
to do with the dropped bikers in any
way, and could just as well have been
set in a priest's home or a YMCA camp.
As it is, I seem to recall the 'reconciliation'
coming down to the reasoning that the
father can now 'scramble' some eggs, and
they can have their father-son breakfast
together, while the rest of the world rots,
the bad-boy Bikers and their drugs still
on the loose. The miserable Biker-den still
there and tolerated. Who owns it? Some
slum landlord who cares nothing for
the tenants? What's a Biker den anyway?
Who lives there? What goes on? Are there
neighbors? No cops? I would think, true
to 'Justice' and uplift, there'd have been a
classier denouement and a better serve
to Justice if, in some Easy Rider sense,
the Bikers had been slain, or the house
blown up, or the Justice of the day took
place. Well, maybe it did - that justice
being false, artificial, and do-nothing.
But no real ends were served. It too was
all a sham. The same rotten world is
left in place. Hey, Jim Jarmusch, next
time, don't call me. I'll call you.
No comments:
Post a Comment