RUDIMENTS, pt. 717
(magna voce)
Oliver Sachs wrote, in
(magna voce)
Oliver Sachs wrote, in
'Seeing God In the Third
Millennium' : 'Hallucinations,
whether revelatory or banal,
are not of supernatural origin;
they are part of the normal
range of human consciousness
and experience....They provide
evidence only of the brain's
power to create them...The
brain comes to terms with
itself, re-establishes itself,
at other levels.' Maybe that
was all right and true enough,
scientifically and as a premise,
but to me it wasn't worth much
as a rule. I found that I simply
wasn't that categorical in my
thinking and thus not able to
so arrange my own thoughts
as to fit any schema. My own
'Hallucinations' - I always felt -
were my life and that was that.
But at the same time, they did
always feel supernatural to me
and generated, too, by outside
force or agent. I saw, and still
see, angels on tree limbs, orbs
of goodness, and growth in light.
The rest is but words, and not
worth much.
-
A person who has the time and
the lined-out qualities of self
to make those distinctions can,
should they then desire to, draw
then whatever conclusions they
wish. A dust-mite can build
to a castle, or become just a
pile of dust, when done. I
always felt the brain just
did what it wanted.
-
There's a funny difference
now, 35 years on, between
the 'country' sort of rural
living I experienced and
what sort of same living is
experienced there now by
the people from here who
go out to the country after
retiring. I don't know if it's
the untoward influence of
TV and all the junk pushed
by that, (maybe they begin
believing all that crud and
start hallucinating it as
the new real when they
arrive in the country into
their custom-built shade-twist
faux log cabins and the rest),
or just a factual and basic
difference between now
and then. You see, I feel
all modern people are nuts;
just your basic pants-poopers,
who'd believe anything, back
any cockamamie scheme
sent their way, and willingly
live like lapdogs, and happy
over it, for the rest of their
days, if they were instructed
that it was right. All you ever
hear nowadays, from the
people who've chucked it
all and bought a country
home and left their original
domicile - (And yes, for
the most part they are people
whose careers were tax
funded careers - municipal
and government and
civil-service people, who
slogged through their
work years helping to
make the tax burden more
expensive for everyone,
so that they could then
eventually escape and still
continue to live off the
taxes of others - and then
somehow still stand to
salute the flag of a land
purporting to be everything
but that) - is how they
have deer and bears and
snakes and the rest, eating
their trash, slamming
through their lands and
fences, etc. When I lived
in the far country, at the
prime end of DDT days
I guess. there wasn't much
of that happening in any
way. The land, for the
most part, was fairly dead
- gophers, groundhogs, deer,
maybe, but no one ever saw
an errant bear or wayward
in-flight eagles, etc. Maybe
the world has changed that
much, or these people have
flights of fancy from the
last Grizzly Adams flick they
may have caught. I never know.
All I know is that those who
get to the country end up
destroying it just like here :
Walmarts to Dandy-Marts,
everywhere.
-
To me, that was always stuff
of the brain. The brain was the
physical thing, the white matter
filling the cranium. And that's
the location of the 'thing' that
I think Sachs was always
gunning after, going on about,
and writing of : the clinical and
the scientific aspects of all that.
To me, the rest - the radical
inversions of the creative ranks
and the hallucinatory incendiaries
of the truly 'creative' person -
were the mind. The Mind. Which
is what dwelled within the Brain
that was the locus for measurement
and stupid-scale works. The
timekeepers and the engineers of
life and physical reality. That was
all the measurable Brain of
colleges and of Corporations.
None of it was 'Mind,' which was
to churning 'co-place' where
real creation lived. The tedious
one can 'examine' the Brain.
The Mind can't be touched.
The brain is a thing.
The mind is not.
one can 'examine' the Brain.
The Mind can't be touched.
The brain is a thing.
The mind is not.
-
I often felt that the New York
City I was walking through was
my own creation. Hallucination?
Maybe so, and maybe too it was
all balderdash on my part to be
thinking that. But what better
way than by enhanced hallucination
was there to reinforce to me the
vividness of the pace I inhabited?
It wasn't all good. It wasn't all
bad. And neither was it going
to be, for, in that aspect, what
'hallucination' ever is completely
this way or that way? They're
never precise, nor can they
be found to reside in any one
location on a power-scale of
being. (If you have to measure -
but again, realize that's what
the brain does, not the mind).
The entire idea resembles the
charmed matter of, again, quarks
and strings and alternate realities.
worm-holes, time-escapes and
other-dimensionalities. You can
believe any of this or not, but
it won't 'change' the existence
or the reality of it in any way.
They all exist, and we all take
place within them, strung as
we are between the pulls and
forces and attractions of the
essence and quality that brings
all matter to the fore to (make)
comprise the reality we see
and feel and recognize and
sense, and which then goes
into the semblance of matter
we recombine among each
other to feel certain enough
to say it is real. Until it isn't
real once again.
-
James Joyce said God is the
voice, the mob, out in the
street. If that was the case,
I saw and still do see God
clearly, and most every day.
-
James Joyce said God is the
voice, the mob, out in the
street. If that was the case,
I saw and still do see God
clearly, and most every day.
No comments:
Post a Comment