Saturday, February 29, 2020

12,597. RUDIMENTS, pt. 978

RUDIMENTS, pt. 978
(more overlooked than remarked upon)
Elmira was always kind
of funny, because it had,
among its inhabitants  -
and most probably due to
remnants of its legacy of
old industrial money and,
as well, the presence of
the college  -  this sort of
'rube,' outside pretension
to 'culture,' as they defined
it. That meant, mostly, a very
mannered art sown in the
local Arnot Art Museum, and
the attendant pretensions to
European high art of culture
of old. Lots of swashbuckling
portraiture, enormous scenes of
elites, and estates, battlements
and, curiously, they also had
a sub-specialty of old, 19th
century 'Medical' paintings.
That's what I called them
anyway. Paintings of old
operations and operating-room
arena-seating medical scenes.
It was weird, yes, but if you
gave a minute's thought to
how the citizens kind of held
high all that old, period, stuff,
it made sense, or some sense,
to see the painted scenes of
medical theater and drama.
I never got into it myself, and
wondered about it. Firstly, it
seemed always male  -  the
doctors, and the patients,  -  and
any female portrayal was just
holding a tray of implements,
in the manner of an extra. And
the explanations alongside the
painting never made mention
of anything except Dr. So and
So and his skills and the steps
he'd implemented with his
groundbreaking work leading
to advances in battlefield
trepanning or surgical removals,
or some British guys, in their
operating theaters, perfecting
appendix removal or whatever.
It was all pretty matronly, in
fact, except there was never
any mention of the female side.
I used to wonder who cleaned
pans and drained the bloods and
boiled the needles and all that.
No mention ever given.
-
The one thing I noticed, in fact,
about Elmira's version of 'High
Society' was how matronly it all
was, almost Victorian in manner.
Shock and surprise seemed always
next to come : The Garden Club;
the Ladies Society of Elmira; The
Elmira Women's Club; etc. Half
proper, half smart, half dumb,
and half perverse. I think if they
had seen a roomful of real 'modern'
art, or 1970's nudes, or anything
like that, they quite possibly would
have swooned. The other funny thing
was how I never saw any 'Daughters'
of Elmira. It was kind of weird;
either they never had female kids,
or the girls left town immediately;
marrying off maybe, or fleeing.
The College had its own coterie
of girls, yes, of course, but they
were from somewhere else. I never
saw any overlap. My one friend,
Mary Kay, was Elmira born and
bred, and a very cool, odd person,
but she was peripatetic and her
travel habits had her everywhere
but Elmira. Worth every penny
of a dollar for sure, but little
connection to Elmira. And there
were the Trell sisters  -  from
Colonia, in fact, right by the
monument on Chain o' Hills
Road. They were triplets, as
I recall, each with a 'D' name,
Debbie, Diane, and Donna, I
think, and I remember them,
together (or maybe two of them
anyway) in the years around 1974,
being enrolled as a group. They
lived in the new 'dorm towers'
just a block or two off from my
house. There were two things,
back then, that were the new
pride of Elmira College : those 2
new, matched, dormitory towers,
(which I called the Twin Towers,
after NYC); and the geodesic
sports dome that had just been
erected over in a field about
5 or 6 miles from the College.
It was the (pretty dumb) college's
effort to attract males to the
school (which until 1969 had
been females only, for some 150
years previous). The school's
leaders paired Males with Sports,
and thus built the equivalent of
a quite trendy, Buckminster Fuller
Geodesic Dome (maybe 2 of them,
I can't remember that either), for
the crush of indoor Winter sports,
for males  -  basketball, hockey,
ice-stuff, and an indoor running 
track. Nice try. They're still there,
and they seem to have aged OK,
and are now played up with major
signage and all that. It's the scholastic
equivalent, in its way, of the Elmira
art world proclivity to matronly
things; except this is to the tune
of boys. Odd. The other big thing
the school had (this might have
'something' to do (ha!) with having
males recently aboard) was a new
facility for women's health and
medical needs. The new Medical
Center was a big on-campus deal.
I guess guys could use it too, but
there were enough controversies back
then about dispensing condoms,
or not, venereal stuff, and even
abortion services, to make one 
wonder. That too is still there.
-
In the same way that Mark Twain
was held sacred and renowned
for the old city of Elmira, so too
were all the traditional formats of
'culture,' fine taste, and 'proper'
deportment and breeding. Even 
if no one really knew what they
were doing in doing so. A lot of
today's consciousness, in the 1970's,
was not fully around : eco-culture,
reverence for Nature, and all that.
Even Mark Twain's gravesite and
graveyard  -  now all done up with
signs and notes and storyboards
about him and his family, and the
other graves of 'notables' like Hal
Roach and Ernie Davis, and varied
slaves and runaways and all that
Underground Railroad stuff  -  AND
the old prison camp, the masses of
Confederate dead, etc., all of that
was more overlooked than it was
remarked upon. No one cared,
and it was all just another scruffy
grave, here and there, of this and 
of whom. Whatever, and a big yawn.
I remember one time, my family
was visiting, and I took them over
to the Mark Twain site  -  not that
it meant anything special to them  -
and in the ensuing rush, my mother
got the car door slammed on her
finger  -  blood gushing everywhere,
a quick trip to the hospital needed,
etc. That took the place of any
Twain grandiosity.
-
Charles Tomlinson Griffes, as I said
in the previous chapter, was an Elmira
boy  -  a local by birth anyway. He died
young, of influenza, but left a body of
music, ('modern' in its terms, then), and
a society for him and his music, also
quite revered, by the same people who
revered all the Arnot Art Museum stuff.
I don't know, he seemed without any
gumption, and pretty ball-less to me,
but that was just me and an unschooled
opinion. No one else around town
knew what to make of him. He certainly
was no Led Zepplin for his day (big
around Elmira's bars). I've always
liked definition and precise lines
and borders (well, maybe, not always),
and Griffes never seemed to offer any
of that. My friend John Barry, as I
recall, a college guy from Indiana, 
was a clarinetist or something in one
of the Griffes ensembles there. He
seemed to perfectly embody the music,
somehow. He'd relocated, with his wife,
from Indiana, and to make the trip, they
had a large moving van they rented, and
he drove his Mercury Capri up into
the truck, and loaded boxes all around 
it. Lo and behold, I'll never forget, they
got to Elmira and the car, from the
boxes rubbing it all during the trip, had
been chafed of its paint in every spot
that a box had touched the car. 'Hi!
How do you like my polka-dot Capri!'
(The body shop guy called it 'chafing').




12,596. THOSE APPLE GUYS

THOSE APPLE GUYS
1. Always looking for their Eve,
these motorcycle men with
their one-click ignition. These
apple guys just dying for
temptation. I was there once
too : watching the clouds to
see for rain, and wondering
what to bring. More beer?
Again?
-
2. Well, there they went and did
it again. There are limbs and
parts now flying all over the 
highway. Don't ask me the
situation; I just gave
a confirmation.

12,595. SO, DREAMY-LIKE

SO, DREAMY LIKE
The particulate matter which falls
from the sky has no name : or little
of a name to be recognized. In the
haze of day I recognized that face,
but I am starving again. Myself.
-
Trafalgar Avenue that runs into
Passaic Avenue that can bring us
down to Hackensack? Are there
really places like this? Is that the
loathsome river wherein the rude
factories once dumped?
-
I think I am clear : what can we
manufacture here? There's now
nothing left to work with, and I
really must be moving on. I
think I'll try the museum,
They must have  a song.

12,594. THE WEDDING

THE WEDDING
Just wait, while they all awaken.
I'm only one slow guy and right
now I do very little. Like the
mandrake in the deep dead of
night I can replicate furriers and
split hairs and parse sentences.
Five to ten? That's exactly what
you'll get  -  so the judge said.
But who needs the time when
time is what you're doing? I 
left green hedges at the wharf
where we'd landed : boats, saddle
sores, candy wrappers, coffee.
-
I can never figure out this life
except for the good way it goes.
ALL things move together, good
fortune for that. The whole boat 
heaves in swells but nothing takes
notice. The coffee in the cups too
rises, the shakers on the table stay
put. If everything moves at once
in unison, nothing really moves
at all. That's how we founded this
universe; and that how we found
it too  -  none the worse for either
laughter or use. Take my name,
I give it to you.

Friday, February 28, 2020

12,593. RUDIMENTS, pt. 977

RUDIMENTS, pt. 977
(get over that, Jeez, please)
I've probably listened to the
Goldberg Variations about
120 times. Bach. The thing
about Bach, which you keep
hearing, and which I've always
found so difficult, is the way
it's said to be 'mathematical.'
That's something, from what
I've experienced, mostly said
by non-musicians. In fact, much
of the strange talk about music,
it seems, most often comes from
people who don't play music.
Upon investigation, and upon
breaking down a lot of what I
hear, I find it's never very
complicated  -  all this music
stuff  - even if it's spoken about
as being so. For someone who is
'making' the music, it all falls
into place; simply. With an
intuitive grasp of what's being
done, or what's occurring. When
music is coming together, by
an intuitive manner, I'm not
exactly sure it's 'mathematical.'
There are about 5 things going
on as a piece of music is written,
and the composer, or music writer's
main task, I would say, is to keep
away from that analytical viewpoint
of what it is or is not, and just let'
is come through. For me, for my
viewpoint, mathematics really
just doesn't cover it; and I'm not
real sure what is meant anyway.
A fugue? A repeating, structural
pattern? With its own progressions
and variants along the way. I'd
suppose that's summed up nicely,
in the Goldberg 'Variations,' by
name. makes sense. You can read
'Godel, Escher, and Bach'  -  it's
kind of a book that touches on
this, but you need not come away
convinced. To me, mathematics
decodes itself as Logic, and logic
is NOT music.
-
It's way too easy to systematize
and lock down spiritual and intuitive
things  -  that's the part of music that
kills it. You end up way afar out on
some weird crescent inhabited by
the John Cage lookalikes that pop
up everywhere.There's nothing
wrong with that, and I like Milton
Babbitt too, but sometimes I think
it's past the point of music. The
verve, certainly, is gone. More than
mathematics, I'd think, it's definition.
Decide first what you wish to define
'music' as, and then your case is made.
Harmonics, tonalities, timbre, tempo.
Chord progressions; chord breakdowns.
Trills and fills; notation leaps and
linked variations over into some
scant tempo fluctuations. And, as
complete and finished, what it was
you wished to start out with, has it
been brought back, to a renowned
completion? A sound conclusion?
And what's left for a listener? Is
there something the listener can
take away upon completing the
listen? A musical phrase of note?
All of that's, I suppose. pretty
old-fashioned, but it's the way
I run, and that's really all I can
speak for.
-
Music as theory just bores me.
Musical lectures make little sense;
and I've sat through plenty of them
back in those Morton Feldman
days. John Cage days too. One
time, about 2010, I went to a
Milton Babbitt concert or recital
or whatever it would be called.
His music is very cerebral, paced
with logic (I thought) and quite
abstractedly systemized. This day,
'singing' along with the ensemble,
there was a female singer, one who
specialized in this sort of Babbitt
accompanying. It was quite the
recital; startling stuff. Judith
Bettina was the Soprano who
accompanied. I saw her a few
days later, still impressed, and I
said so. Then I said, meaning by
it to get across my impression
of the music and the reach, 'How
do you get to that? What do you
look for?' (A rather dumb query,
and I'm sure I sounded like a
fool). She said, 'Oh, it's nothing;
it's what I do!' I'll leave it there,
because I don't know what else
to say. You can look her up
and see for yourself, and listen.
Fascinating stuff, all around; and
something sure to alter your own
definitions of what you think
of as 'Music.'
-
Now, this may all be interesting 
for you, or it may not; but to me
it always has been, and I enjoy
it. So, as the best writing is often
writing that directly relates the
experience being told, I'll go
on. My most enjoyable, and
probably 'educational' experiences
were the times I spent in those 
few jazz lofts I used to get to.
These guys were tough, most
often black, downtown jazz
hipsters; the kind of guys who'd
end up playing the Five Spot or
someplace like that, on off-nights,
usually earlier in the week than
the big-feature weekend and 
later-week nights. I guess that's
when the real money was made;
the rest of the time these places
were looser, and these jazz
loft guys, coming mostly from
the old loft district along the
west-teen streets. They were
often really great spaces, and
these guys, if not playing
anywhere else, would come 
straddling in for a jam, or a
groove, session, running long
strings of crazy notes, almost
out of control, but never breaking
any barriers. Just harsh, rabid
jazz  - the sort that was already 
out of style by then. They were
all leftover guys, and they knew
it. The young blacks coming up
were not like them at all, and all
the militant proclivities of the
anger and the politics of the
then -current street turmoils
never really affected them; they
lived in another time, a sort of
syncopated past that was quickly
becoming homeless. Can you even
call jazz 'historic?' Did it ever
really have a past? I don't think;
the sort of thing this jazz was had
no past, it was of the moment,
heck it was of that very day;
popping up, and growing. All
was discovery, and each of these
guys was like a black Christopher
Columbus of the music-waves.
Drifting, probably off course, filled
with fears and mistakes, nonetheless
discovering some of the great and
most vibrant places to come. This
all had and has a different logic,
this particular form of old jazz.
Just as todays 'Country' music
bears little relation to the origins 
of American 'Country' music and
is now all pizazz, flash and appeal,
so too today's 'Jazz' is merely a
product. Mellow jazz, soft jazz,
whatever they call it now on WBGO,
Newark. It's not that stuff at all;
these guys were onto something
completely other. Let me try and
explain it, as I saw, heard, and
witnessed it, in 1968. It was hard
and mean, like the NYC skies
back then were hard and mean.
It allowed for solo magnificence,
like achievement used to allow
for individuals. Now everything's
trying to be ensemble success,
group-form accomplishment, like
no one's any longer allowed to
achieve something on their own 
and by themselves. It was singular,
in that if it was different and
accomplished, it flew fine. If it
crash-landed, that too was
accepted. There were no market
surveys to first determine what 
the 'audience' wanted. That's
bullshit. A guy with an idea, as
isolated musically as it may have
been, went with that idea, because
it was his. There was no mathematics
involved; it was created by listening,
getting the message, reading the info
given, and translating all that
back through the very personal
formats of the composer or the
music writer. That's all shunned now,
and what it gives us are the usual
grab-bags of washed-up dudes
giving us their tainted version of
'American Songbook' crap. Get
over that, jeez, please. Raw talent
and raw beauty come but once
or twice in a lifetime. When you
see it, (or hear it), grab it.
-
There was a composer from Elmira
too, John Tomlinson Griffes. He
died young, during the influenza
epidemic around 1917. I was
never too attracted to his music,
and, thus, I admit, never really
delved into it. Lots of woodwinds
and the airy stuff I can't much
abide. As far as his music theory
and musical ideas, I guess I'll have
to begin checking.The college had
a Griffes Quartet, as a recall, and
Elmira itself had some sort of
swooning local music set who'd
enshrined him highly  -  the tea
and biscuit crowd, the old
families of once-industrial might,
whose gigantic old fortunes and
mansions and homes were, by the
1970's already beginning to rot
away into that echoing decrepitude
that Elmire now still carries. I
hope perhaps the music has
fared better.
-
He was always considered as
part of that 'turn' of the previous
century and later, impressionist
school of music  -  Ravel, Debussy,
etc.,  -  a bit too continental, I
thought, from a time, of course,
when that just pre-WWI world
ethos had not yet coalesced; so
that saying 'Continental' in this
context makes little sense except
to say 'trading musical influences'
or, with the soon to be major wars,
'You kill on your continent, I'll
send over my guys to help!' Little
to do, had that, with airy music.

Thursday, February 27, 2020

12,592. RUDIMENTS, pt. 976

RUDIMENTS,  pt. 976
(remembering the baldwin ladies)
In that previous chapter I
brought up Mary Tse  -  the
Taiwanese girl, staying in
Elmira. It made me think
of something else: When we
were away once, for some 2
weeks, we agreed for her to
stay in our house there,
house-sitting and tending
to our dog, while we were
gone. It started out OK.
We had no contact over
that time, and upon returning
home we found  -  no Mary,
and no dog! I guess I should
have known; many times
Asians have an aversion to
dogs, for whatever reason.
But Mary had not shown any.
What happened though, she
said, was that after two days
or so, the dog (uncharacteristically)
was barking, antsy, and acting
nervous. Mary was, or felt she
was, overwhelmed. She bailed,
after letting the dog out! (I
probably should have beaned
her one good one for that, but
didn't). Mary just turned her
back on the whole scene and
went back to her college quarters
(only a few blocks away anyway).
The at-large dog, making noise,
and locally wandering, was,
fortunately, taken in by the two
elderly sisters who lived alone in
a large house at the corner,
with a fenced yard. These
were the wealthy Collins sisters,
of whom we knew little. No
husbands, or at least only dead
ones. They were more than a
bit eccentric in their elder
habits, but tolerated. Not
often seen, one of them drove
a large, 1950's, car, to get the
usual groceries, and to do errands.
(There was a show on about this
time, called The Waltons, which
also had two half-tipsy, eccentric
sisters in it  -  the Baldwin Sisters.
Which is what we called the Collins
sisters). When we arrived home,
and tried to see what had gone on,
they told us they had the dog, and
they related what had happened,
except they thought we'd simply
abandoned the dog, and thus were
a bit hostile. After we explained all
that had transpired, our way, they
brought us to the dog. Which dog
they had been 'sedating' for about
8 days  -  by whatever means; dog
sedatives or whatever. I don't recall
exactly. The dog was a mess, but
way-pleased to see us, and it took
3 days or so for it to come around
to normal again. Lucky break. I
considered all fortunate, and let
it go. BUT there was more...
-
These Baldwin ladies  -  oops, I
mean Collins ladies  -  had a
habit of, in any public or yard
scene, of being overly sweet, 
almost cloyingly so, friendly, 
sentimental. Offensive to no 
one, and pleased with the world. 
One day  -  this  is true  -  our 
nearby neighbors, on our side 
of the street, a black family, 
friends to us, very nice; the
guy was a chef in some
local, fancy, restaurant, were
having a large, yard-gathering,
cook-out, party. They had a
built-in pool, there was amplified
music, wafting aromas of meat
and barbecue, etc. All evidences
pointed to a big party. Well,
about mid-afternoon, lo and 
behold, (remember, I said this
is true) who should be out in
the middle of the street, drunk
off their asses, but the two
Collins ladies. Looking slovenly,
wobbly, all disheveled, (and
quite obviously drunk), of all
things, the two were screaming:
'You fucking N...ers, with your
smells and smelly food, loud
music, and noise, you're no 
good. We've never liked you
being here and this just proves
how disgusting you are!' I'm
not even covering half of what
they said but this gets the gist.
Nothing violent came of it; the
cops were called, arrived, took
the two ladies off. About a 
month or so later there was
a court hearing of some sort,
and I recall maybe a fine, but,
most humbling was the public
apology  -  to be given in the
street, right where the offense
occurred, and when sober. They
were quite apologetic, real or
not, I don't know; they seemed
humbled and embarrassed, and,
after that, really were seen very 
little. The whole thing was one
of the weirdest scenes I'd ever
witnessed, from its start to its
finish. And just think, they'd
been sedating my dog too!
-
This little street I'm talking of,
in Elmira, was Lincoln Street.
At the intersection of Washington.
Our house was #827, and it was
two houses in, from Washington,
where the Washington School
was  -  across the street of
Washington, the Branch Office
which was a bar I've written off
as the Bra Off, which is how it
appeared when the traffic light
was in front of it as you waited
at the corner. The word Branch,
back then, was above the word
Office, on the sign (It's no longer
like that), and all you'd see were
the first three letters of each line.
There was also a 7-11, a record
store, and a bowling alley. Those
last two are still there. The Collins
ladies interacted with none of
that, (thankfully none at all with 
the Branch Office). But, in any 
case, the little street was quite
interesting and had its share of
quite unique people.