Wednesday, January 15, 2020

12,470. RUDIMENTS, pt. 932

RUDIMENTS, pt. 932
(before cars had cladding)
I've always been able to get
in and out of situations OK.
No one has ever thrown a
metaphorical stove at me.
I've usually managed to be
able to see what was coming,
watch for what was expected,
and unexpected too. Some of
the best times I've faced have
come from situations mostly
unexpected, and the rest of
routine and sameness can be
a boring Hell to undergo.
-
One of the things that's brought
out, in preliminary drawing classes,
of the base sort anyway  -  and
one which I've never thought
made much sense  -  is the point
of drawing a baby's head. In order
to teach art, or drawing, I've
always thought a person would
be far advanced past this point,
the point of making such a
stupid sort of comment  -  but
it is, really, the sort of thing
that teaching and instruction
gets stuck imparting to dolts,
and pity the instructor. Not
fit to be called 'Artist.'
-
The point, simply made, and I
only recall it from long ago, was
that a 'baby's head, or a child's
anyway, does NOT develop from
a baby-size and is pretty-fairly
full-sized right from the start.
Hmmm? It's actually pretty funny,
thinking about art students tracing
a M&M to get a baby's head on
a baby's body. On the other hand,
however, they don't trace oranges
do they. So in drawing a child the
need has to be taken to somehow
come up correctly with a fine
and proportional recommendation
of suggestion in the drawing.
How to get across the head?
-
In latter days, of course, my thinking
on this has changed some  -  and I
realize this startling point now, if I
were to put it in some colloquial
form : This 'child' is born with a
regular-sized head, and most all of
the apparatus needed, so that it can
later be filled with content  -  yes,
yes, in the same manner that we buy
an empty computer so that it too can,
eventually, be filled with content.
Hopefully prime content. Hopefully
wise and learned stuff. We get to
make the choices, oddly enough,
about ALL things  -  size of storage,
content, deletions, amassing and
archiving. In the Platonic symbolism
of the world about us, I wonder why
we are not then allowed that same
range of choice before we are born.
To select, perhaps, cranial size,
optimal intelligence-speed, etc. To
my knowledge (no, not to MY
knowledge, but to the rational
arranging of the sodden world
we now live in), it is said that we
have no choice in these matters,
all is a flat scale, and what we get
we get. Is that then proof of God?
Otherwise would not life just be
one big Best Buy or computer
store, with long lines and with, 
hopefully, fast check-out lines?
-
The funny thing now is, in
the same way that traditional
parents of old used to be able
to control what came into their
homes, these new kids now with
their full-grown, empty heads,
get to fill them with whatever
drivel they want, because parents,
within today's social milieu, can
no longer - or do not any longer,
because they share the ethos  -
control what comes in or what their
baby-heads face; school social,
etc. All glory to the big head!
-
Before cars had cladding, the
world always seemed a tad
slower and more resolute to
me.  Cladding pre-dates home
computering by some amount
of years, maybe a decade? The
first cladding I'd seen, as a
design adjunct I guess, was
about 1985 on those Mercedes Benz
models that introduced it along the
lower body panels. It looked stronger
and tougher, even if it was just a
form of plastic. I wonder what effect
cladding had on body-shops? Much
fewer lower panels dings and dents
to fix, and far fewer rust-jobs from
rotted rocker panels and door-lips?
Just guessing. Had I ever seen such
'cladding' on a 54 Chevy or somesuch
auto, when younger, I imagine I'd
had been perplexed about the whats
and whys of its being there. And
why would that have been? Because
it was a different present  -  things
were staid and solid, metal was
taken as metal, and accepted. All
the big-head kids at that time
knew that cars were made of steel
and that metal dented. Not so much
that it needed protection; more that
it was always just 'there' and facing
it's own proliferating danger. Danger
that everyone accepted. Those big,
empty heads kept room for mishap,
danger, and disaster in ways no one
now ever does. Maybe in my own
big, empty young head, I replayed
the Dresden Fire-bombing, or the
concentration camps, or the torched
and bombed-out wrecks of old
WWII Europe  -  and of course
the two A-bombs to which the
Japanese were treated  -  and
accepted them, each as being part
of the vulnerable and unclad world
I lived in. What came after that?
Now? The safety zones, the gentle 
handling, and the only thing
of this sort they maybe knew :
the Twin Towers crumbling on
live-screen school TV, without
any repercussions right then,
as protected and safe to them
as the cladding on Dad's Benz.




No comments: