Tuesday, January 7, 2020

12,447. RUDIMENTS, pt. 925

RUDIMENTS, pt. 925
('my friend frank, the telephone pole')
It's funny now to read old
writings, American stuff,
about the recent decades.
Most of it was approached
all wrong. But people then,
at the times of the writing,
proclaimed it right and
strongly so. I had an English
teacher once, way back at
the end of high school, who
was always going on about
'Growing Up Absurd,' by
Paul Goodman. I never
knew what was in her head,
because it wasn't the sort
of book kids going through
the experiences and phases
he was writing about (mostly
wrongly) would care about
reading. It was a book about
all that but written - instead  -
for vengeful adults. Meaning,
by that, adults who probably
were angry that they were not
going through all that themselves
and being young again. It's a good
read, don't get me wrong, and
some of it now reads as funny too.
Paul Goodman, in addition, was
a predatory gay man  - from all
I've read about him, carefully,
since  -  whose every move was
about a move, on someone of
the male persuasion. People at
parties and things actually would
avoid him. He had a nice, broad,
1950's axe to grind and by means
of this book, he ground it. So,
taking that book too seriously
was a wrong thing to do. The
teacher's name was Sylvia Oettle,
pronounced like 'Ootley.' Like
Tetley in the tea company name,
but Ootley.
-
I read it, and discussed it with her;
but it was a boring, gruesome read.
Her explications of it helped nothing.
The subject matter, and the concerns
of its moment, kept the book very
grounded in its then-present day, all
of which now is a long-past, for us.
Hind-sight, they say, is often 20/20,
but this book was way off. Goodman
uses the premise of the book to step
off and go on about things that irked
him : beatniks, hipsters, drop-outs,
corporations, social culture, and more.
You name it, he touched (upon) it.
The funny thing is, in this book, you
could read it cover to cover, twice
and back and forth too, and come
away with the idea that females
didn't exist, he just has no concept
of a female in the book; everything
is boys and young men. It's hard
to imagine what I'm saying unless
you dose it yourself and see.
-
Anyway, besides being pesky, she
always mixed me up with her sort of
gung-ho, over-the-top, attitude about
everything SHE found cool. I guess
she too wanted to be young; and in
that pushy, Jewish school-marmy
forceful way, she imposed all sorts
of things no one was supposed to
mind because it was HER pushing
it. As if she had clearance to do
anything she wanted, and no one
else did. I kept as far away from
her and her little cabal of 'prime
students' as I could. She had a
real bunch of ass-kissers always
following her around too. The
biggest thing for them, and her,
was to go, as a group, to things
as fancy little mid-60's hip films,
like Georgy Girl, and Morgan, and
The Graduate, and the come back
and talk about how great and how
enlightening it all was  -  as if that
was English. What a dumb subject.
I've always hated the manipulation
of movies, and they could see none
of that  - the entire bunch of them
was blind to what was happening.
That whole film thing anyway is
just more of the same Jewish crap,
writ large, that takes over people's
fake lives. Films and movie-making
have no place in real life. When you
carefully look at what's going on
with that, you can see it's all a
degenerative monster-cracker that
sucks the air from normal life. It's
a linear, modern draft of a second
revision of Reality, and people
are being take by it. In so many
ways the vapid concept of
'entertainment'  -  simple and
boastful and useless, is taken
over and is-used for propaganda.
Negativity. Breakdown. Callousness.
Once that enters the system, pure
mythology takes over. Prideful
modern man has no qualms about
laughing at the Gods of old, the
two-headed monsters and griffins
of Olympia, the landings and presences
of Gods and kings from other realms,
but they'll slavishly lick at the
lollipop of sick and fantasmagorical
Evil and Destruction, and buy into it
all, if it's presented to them as stupid
popcorn entertainment.
-
Oettle's brother, by the way, was Arthur
Sills, at that time the Attorney General
of the State of New Jersey. Big deal too.
That's like a big, fat, fancy-ass lawyer
for the Government, sucking taxpayroll
money for much of nothing except the
reinforcing of State stuff they already
want and have implemented. It's
an insider's game, for sure. He lived
in Metuchen. That would have made
her, his sister, as a kid, Sylvia Sills.
Which I thought was pretty funny.
She would have been better off
opening a window store : Sylvia
Sills Sells Sills, Inc.
-
It got really tiresome, by the end of
the term, to have to put up with her
effrontery. Then she'd started calling
my mother, at home, going on about
my obstinate refusal to adhere to my
potential, go with the program, etc. It
didn't take much more than a breeze
and a whisper to convince my mother
of something  -  all it had to do was
look or sound the least bit 'official'  -
and she was then off and running
about my violating standard
schoolboy ethics. Baloney for lunch,
and baloney for dinner too. The
final straw was, whenever it was
exactly, there was a 'teacher's
strike' in the school district  -  one
that lasted a few weeks. Mrs. Oettle
decided to hold those whiz-bang 
classes, English, the selected kids, 
at her home. She told or asked me
to come too, but I said 'No.' Which 
kind of annoyed her, but I said
'If you guys can strike over 'money'
issues, it seems to me that your
big-deal 'Teaching' ideals are full
of nothing at all.' Right after that
her and some other student stole my
poem, which I had been withholding
from the 'Literary' yearbook, and
published it anyway ('Friends Of the
World'), plus had given it over to some
jerk art-student illustrator  -  which
resulted as well in a hideously
illustrated selection. There was
just nothing ever good there.
My own, secondary, title to this
piece of adolescent drivel, was
'My Friend Frank, the Telephone
Pole,' but they didn't use that.
I should have called it
Death By Osmosis.'

No comments: