263. EAT ! EAT
I've never liked food; it's
just never meant much
to me, I dislike the eating
of it, the tastes, the smells,
the distinctions and those
stipulations that cooks and
diners - those eating - make
about this being good or
that being good. It's a
very human, a very
physical, thing. I'm much
more ascetic about things;
leave me be, I'll get by. I
have never much cared
about the human element,
From A to Z, any of it.
There are people who
will go on and on
about tastes and
textures, smells
and sensations,
every little bit of
the entire eating
and digestion thing
- the food, the mix,
the chew, the fragrance.
As far as I'm concerned
it's crazy. It's never going
to stop, and I know that -
those sorts of people
never quit. Even as the
level and quality of
'food' goes down,
they'll just continue,
transferring their
lust for the chew to
some other level
of food intake -
whether restaurant-style,
fine or not, any of
that brewed at home
fire and steak stuff,
or just the endless
declensions and
re-definings of
fast-food or
casual-dining
this or that. That's
what they live for.
Like wine people,
with their 'flinty'
palates with hints
of blackberry and
cherry. In places like,
for instance, Brooklyn,
cherry. In places like,
for instance, Brooklyn,
now, and others, there
are entire sub-cultures of
people dedicated to the
complete experience of
perfect dining - converted
space taverns, bars, and
restaurants where only the
cognoscenti eat the most
perfectly-prepared foods
amidst giggles and smiles.
are entire sub-cultures of
people dedicated to the
complete experience of
perfect dining - converted
space taverns, bars, and
restaurants where only the
cognoscenti eat the most
perfectly-prepared foods
amidst giggles and smiles.
-
Besides my Vedic
studies, I'd long ago
read two books that
provided me intense
enjoyment and
intellectual stimulation
- like some idiot's
four-hundred-dollar
sit down at a fine
restaurant somewhere.
The first one, mentioned
here in a very early
chapter, was the
'Autobiography of
a Yogi', which I took
in all and total, at a
ripe young age, and
then, later, about
1968, the 'Secret
Oral Teachings in
Tibetan Buddhist
Sects.' These were
monumental and
formative to me. Don't
get me wrong, they
weren't Huck Finn or
Catcher In the Rye,
but they filled that
niche needed at their
times. One of the
Vedic edicts - which
I always liked - was,
to enforce holy
asceticism, never
eat food that you'd
prepared yourself.
Only eat what and
when others give
to you to eat. It was
a twofold path -
you yourself would
not be preparing
anything, and therefore
would not eat anything
'you' had made, and
at the same time you'd
only eat when someone
else offered to you.
That could be often,
or it could be very
sparse. I learned what
and where to keep
away from so as NOT
to enhance the chances
of people heaving food
at me. It made sense. It
was all about 'desire' and
human-life detachment.
was all about 'desire' and
human-life detachment.
The Secret Tibetan Oral
Teachings, at the same
time, discouraged eating
by approaching it with
disgust - you fill your
gut, uselessly, with things
that only use up your
own energy and tax
your system so that
you can produce the
remnants as feces.
Why then bother? Like
the snake or reptile,
consuming itself.
the snake or reptile,
consuming itself.
Now that would kill
anyone's appetite.
Sometimes you
have to 'go long',
using an extreme
idea to advance
the point. That's
how I understood
it. At the same time,
there was a lot of
'negative approach'
stuff there.
-
Funny thing was, thirty
years later I'd turned that
all around, in that, besides
basically (really) not eating,
as much as I was able to
'NOT' eat, I'd forbidden
myself, by a form of
personal edict to NOT eat
food prepared by others.
Which - since I myself
would never go near a
stove - brought it all
down to consuming
whatever it was that
my wife produced.
Poor girl - a total
foodie and a massive
cook, all good. Totally
into the tastes and
textures and recipe
formats and all that,
of food. I admit
it's all wasted on
me. But, she does
manage. To this day
I have trouble being
around people who
are eating, or cooking.
The entire process now
has become so divorced
from reality anyway,
with microwaves and
convection things and
the raw food movement,
and all that vegetarian
and vegan stuff endlessly
bandied about, that
people have actually
almost convinced
themselves now that
they are eating
for the 'good' of
mankind. Yeah, sure.
Have another helping,
there, chubby, of some
high-caloric crap
while the kid in Mali,
with his eyes buggy
and flies up his nose,
is sucking on a sponge
he found, soaked in
someone's last-night's
beetle-juice gravy.
-
In the seminary, we got
three meals a day, no
questions asked. The
quality of that food -
we got Southern food,
most always, scrapple,
pork, waffles, syrups,
tings like that - I can't
vouch for. I knew
nothing about it, nor
did I know anything
about what supplies
were trucked in, and
from where, or how
fresh anything was.
In 1961 and those years
after, no one really ever
cared about those things,
except maybe Jack LaLanne
and those Mr. Universe
guys who went around
on TV hawking their
wholesomeness and
carrot juice. Oh well,
you had to be there.
-
There's never absolutely
any need for three meals
a day. The entire concept
is bizarre. It's a mistake.
Has to be. I have found,
with some training and
by real discipline, it's
possibly more like one
meal every three days -
that would suffice. This
whole three meals a
crap does nothing good.
It produces waste, and
taxes the body; all of
which then becomes a
cleanliness fetish for
a million people,
wiping their butts
with toilet paper so
special and soft you
could sleep on it; which
processes of manufacture
are toxic and deadly,
ruining waterways
and fields, and trees.
The bathroom and
cleanliness nazis can
rule the roost with
their idiotic airwaves
stuff - scents and
cover-smells,
automatic bowl
cleansers, sinks
and soaps and the
rest, every bit of it.
All these freaky
environmentalists
and people screaming
about global warming
and bad water and
Amazon forests and
clear skies. they're
the same ones
constantly stuffing
their mouths and
then cleaning their
asses with all this
stuff. That's all a
real disconnect.
A basic, human
asceticism
would solve a
lot of the health,
toxins and well-being
problems we face.
Cancer, chemistry,
sores, digestion ills
and sickness would
all be alleviated.
Nobody in their
right mind should
eat three meals a
day. In fact, people
ought to learn how
to fast. We are a
nation of pigs
and piglets.
No comments:
Post a Comment