Thursday, August 6, 2020

13,037. RUDIMENTS, pt. 1,138

RUDIMENTS, pt. 1,138
(incense and peppermint / magic and vice)
I saw a sign the other
day, something about
tori amos, which I read,
unfortunately, as 'oat rims.'
which is close but not exact,
and I wasn't even sure who
she was  -  just one of those
names you get by osmosis.
And then, unbelievably, as I
was leaving the state I saw a
building clearly marked, 'New
Jersey Department of Inspiration.'
Except it wasn't that; it was
'Transportation.' Too bad.
My life is all about such
disappointments.
-
Which led me to other things, as
usually happens : I remembered
there being something called 'The
Magnificat.' It's a prayer, I guess
it's Catholic only, not sure, or a
reaction anyway, by Mary,
supposedly uttered after the
'angel' announces to her that
she was to carry and give birth
to Jesus, in whatever mysterious
way those Bible tales tell it.
All well and good, and believe
what you will. It was all a long
time ago (even though in reality
such matters become part of the
'eternal present,' and have little
to do with time). I was once again
thinking about it, as I remember
I used to do a lot, long ago, in
seminary days. I always figured
all that pre-societal and biblical
stuff to be before any of us had
the inklings of social order, income
variations, levels, etc., by which
current society, with its millions
of special niches, made us and the
present day what we are. So it
surprised me to realize (apparently
it's now simply called 'Song of Mary'
and the 'Magnificat' thing goes unused.
Anyway, it's also Luke 1:46-55), that
deep within it are the following two
lines : "He has filled the hungry with
good things but has sent the rich away
empty."
-
Man, that's a real slammer, and to
think that it's from 2000 some
years ago is even crazier. Tiered
society? Anger and envy? Greed
and revenge? What weird sentiments,
and what an odd view of God that
all is. I was floored to realize that
some sort of insidious rich vs. poor
strife was always going on, and
had been  -  even in that context.
Super-strange to me. And then,
if you recall, that whole Jesus
thing about how it would be
easier for a rich man to pass
through the eye of a needle 
that it would be for him to 
enter Heaven! Man, that must
have come across as some pretty 
radical stuff. No wonder he got
the death penalty (even though
they say he was always supposed
to), and by his own people no
less! The entire thing came across
as so bizarre  -  seemingly a ton
of cosmic preparation, into which
every little piece fit, all that
Line of David stuff, etc., for
the sake of three short years of
public ministry, then Death, and
then three more days in a tomb?
Nothing seemed right about it,
even taking it all on faith and 
such. You take it out of the
story, and its context, and then
the whole thing also has to stand
outside of Nature. Why? because
Nature is efficient, doesn't waste
steps, and doesn't throw morals
or values around. The leopard
kills the antelope, or whatever,
and the dead carcass is meat 
and bones for others' feasts,
not a deal wasted at all.
-
I have to be truthful and say that
growing up American, I really
never had an issue with that idea 
of stratified society and rich people
and all that. The contrasts never
meant anything to me -  all those
Cadillacs and Imperials and the
rest, some people just had that
stuff, others had 6-year old Fords
or Chevies. So what? Some people
were doctors and lawyers, and
some kids were doctors' and 
lawyers' kids. Money wasn't all
it was cracked up to be, and I
was quite happy, it seemed, with
my own meager level of existence.
On the other hand, all that angel
annunciation stuff, and all the
preparation and events and drama,
seems to have all gone for naught.
Inefficient use of time and of 
resources.  I'm talking here from
Nature's view, not religion, which
anyone can take up on their own
and the faith angles and all that.
I'm just saying, we're physical
beings in a physical plane and
Nature doesn't skip beats in
order to make miracles.
-
Another thing, if one is inclined
to think along those terms of
His ministry and miracles and
walking on water and raising the
dead and all that, was how, if
so, I felt that a person should
accept those things and go all
out for them. Stand for something.
Yes, your guy walked on water
and made water into wine.
But instead, what you get are
all these half-witted  slackers
who, while acceptant of it all, do
profess that one needn't believe 
any of that, that those New
Testament stories are merely 
allegorical, symbolic  -  even that 
the 'eye of the needle' image didn't
mean what it said. That it was
called that and was actually a
real place, a 'narrow passage in 
the Sinai that camels and travelers 
had great difficulty getting through 
on their treks. That it was all story-line 
and another one of the visual allegoric 
scenes,  as presented by Jesus for the
everyday person to grasp. What a
load of bunkum! Stand up for yourself
and for your beliefs, if you've got them.
Or I'll have to come up with some
allegorical story about a weasel so you'll 
understand it in very common terms.
-
That's a whole lot of learning
to take up and absorb, and all
through History it's the religion 
guys who were always trying to 
STOP things from progressing 
or moving on. They had too
much invested, all around, in
keeping people weak and 
fettered, shut down and, as
well, convinced they were
powerless. Incense and
peppermint? Magic and vice?
Yeah, go ask the Vatican
about all that.


No comments: