BELOW THE WATER LINE
(pt. 75)
My mind has a reaction to things. It freezes.
It wants to say, 'Oh Jesus, not more Avenel
stuff again.' Yeah, well. It
was always kind of
funny for me to realize how it goes with the
'history' of
places. Woodbridge and Avenel
were peppered with these tiny ideas of itself as
a
'place' that used to be - but only the small,
historical types knew of it. Now
it's different -
there are markers and historic posts about this
and that.
People put a glide on things, all puffed
about, - pretending. None of it has any reality -
they
make up all these stories from the most
basic rudiments. Parker Press. Valentine
Brick.
Bitting's Brewery. There are kernels of truth, only
kernels, to all of
this - but they erect stories and
edifices. When I was a kid no one gave a shit about
and of that stuff. When it did begin to trickle down,
I didn't know what to do about it because it was all
being run by elitist and snarky town insiders. I just
watched. There was a woman around town named
Ruth Wolk - an annoying
smidgeon of a woman,
proud of herself and proud of her search for 'history'
-
but it all had to be right, had to fit her design first,
except for that it
wasn't history. She wrote a few small,
published, paper-back books with old
photos and tales
and stories of 'Woodbridge Township' - collections of
old
photos, small stories, tales and captions, and mostly
ideas of the grand, older,
days of a construct she
named 'Woodbridge'. It was all of her own making -
and
she was a complicit in it as anyone else. All tea
and cosys, for the ladies. She'd write of fine old,
secluded
homes, farmland and grassy lanes. She'd
write of wells and water-sources, small
knots of people
organizing to do something authentic and real. Yet,
at the end
of the same blurb, she'd boast of the now
'grand' Woodbridge, how it was turned
into parking
lots, shopping, roadways and large organizations of
political and
civic - and school - groups. her
impetus and focus, as is most usual for
these sorts
of people, was on organized schooling : grandiosity
over Boards of
Education, new, grand schoolhouses
and collectivized districts and regionalized
high
schools and all that. Everything headed in the
complete other direction of
the tiny porridge she'd
just been brewing - seeking instead consolidation,
hugeness, organization, a centralized, authority-down
sequence of limit and
control. She could never answer
to that stuff, mainly because she was a liar and made
her half of it all up to fit her lame narrative. I never
figured any of that stuff out, the whys of it, nor did I
understand where and and all of these 'town' people,
with their bizarre attitudes and ideas, had come from :
I knew the
clutch of them, mostly - temple dwellers
from the older, centralized yet
small, Woodbridge.
But they were just as intent on turning everything
away,
making it bad, tweaking it to their higher levels
of regal and splendiferous
(vain) authority and
centralization. The world was turning and spinning
fast -
all things were being altered. There
were two
churches, catholic ones anyway, in Avenel. When we
first moved there,
the original church building was
on Avenel street. It was a pretty simple, small
and
ordinary church sort of brick structure; very nice
actually. It faced the
main street of the simple town;
it was a 'satellite' parish or mission/outreach
of
Woodbridge's St. James Church - an outpost for the
burgeoning population of
the developing swamplands
which were Avenel. In about three years the parish
had
outgrown its church, and a larger, more modern
'church-by-churchbook design
book' structure was in
place, destroying the woods behind the older church
which
still stood and was left standing for some 8 or
so years - used as a gym,
social center for kids,
basketball hall, etc. A total mish-mash. Boy Scout
meetings in the basement, once a 'catholic' Troop
73 had been established to
debunk the nearby
Presbyterian Troop 42, of longer-standing, and
more manly,
proportions (tougher kids). It wasn't
really as if, in Boston or somewhere like
that, the
lines separating the religious parts of town meant
anything. They
meant nothing at all - it was mostly
in the addled brains of parents and/or
old-timers
from other places; people who kept such scores,
who marked these
things down. All of us kids,
we'd run together no matter who or what - most
of
it could be described as dastardly stuff from any
angle so what matter is it in
a religious context
anyway. These are always adult concerns, not
kid concerns.
To predicate the separation of Boy
Scout troops, neighboring, a block or two
from
each other, on the flimsy premise of religious
affiliation is some totally
bizarre and perverse
premise, something only a perverted adult could
think up.
It was medieval and destructive to any
sense of either proportion or reality.
It's wasn't that
much different - in its stupid, no-brain adult way -
than
was the rather random of school grades into
things like 5-6-7, etc. That whole
thing was purely
for the convenience of adults and their pecking-order
mechanism
dumb-ass brains. Everyone and
everything overlapped, but they just wouldn't
consider that. Randomly proscribing this or that
as a level, a break-point , was
just another way of
controlling kids and forcing them to think in teacher
ways.
Boards of Education, in reality, were nothing
more than labor-agencies for
pushing along teacher
pay and segmenting the process of 'Education'
(actually
its very opposite) into the levels and
paradigms needed to run business-like
foils of
learning and pay and station. Most teachers were
more interested,
anyway, in sleeping with each
other - enticing the new, young ones, into
place,
becoming close to that new arrival with the nice
breasts, or the handsome
new dark, tall, and
handsome teacher, still single. (Or not). Not a
god-damned
thing of any of it had to do with
education. That was a form which was force-fit
over the entire enterprise. It was employment,
it was labor, and it was
socialization (and often
eroticism) all rolled up into one. Something to
keep
adults occupied, and have peculiar ranks
and status levels established. I would
have
gladly walked out on their 'education' bullshit
the very first chance I
got - but you cannot,
and 'they' have all the enforcement tools
arrayed to be used against you. No wonder
there was so much misery.
-
What things we did, as boys, as
kids, even as
'Catholic' Boy Scouts (go figure) was more along
the likes of
breaking into the here or there abandoned
house (there were still a few hulking,
huge, old
mansions behind massive shrubberies and trees,
left in Avenel;
abandoned, for the most part, and
untended), wrecking what we saw, destroying
plates
and dishes, flinging old 78's (hard, black, thick plastic
that smashed
like glass) into trees and walls, entering
the rears of the varied junkyards
just to outwit the
mad, junkyard dogs and destroy windshields,
smash lights,
wreck otherwise already wrecked cars.
We'd smash windows where we could,
slingshot rocks
and pebbles into things, use various firecrackers and
other
small means of explosive, as kids are wont to
do, I guess, to blow things up,
main or slaughter
small animals, running through the woods with bows
and arrows
set for squirrels, birds, or any other small
ground animal - which as far as
out kid-frenzy went,
should be 'ground-up' animals anyway. It was crazy.
It was
bizarre and wrong, and sad too - as I think of
it now I still shudder. What we
were thinking, I'll
never know. It certainly bore no semblance of either
side of
the stupid 'religious' divide which had been
presented to us. Protestant dances,
and Catholic
dances. Protestant Boy Scouts and Catholic Boy
Scouts? I mean, and
still do, what the fuck? Whose
strangely altered and medievalized thinking goes
like that? You read of these sorts of things in the
year 1410 or something, but
this was 1950's Avenel,
a shit-hole suburban, low-priced, swamp-infested
construction project in which people were
supposed to live - living new lives,
highly-stylized
new lives, in fact, of ease and splendor, of toothpaste
in tubes
and butter in tubs, lightly whipped. How
to defend this negative and
backward-looking idea?
How to (for us), in fact, live with it? It was child
abuse,
of a sort never mentioned. Never still is, and the
same sort of
undertakings are going on. It's a real
child abuse - all those assumptions and
methods
and means; they're cruel, and they're nasty and they
really do wreck
children. Children never live our of
it, they never really do grow through it.
The wounds
are ever-present. (First they pierce you and wound
you for 18 years,
beating the bejeezus out of you
with crap, and then they expect you to willingly
enough agree to a few years in the Military - where
their same assumptions,
masked deviltries, tortures
and nasty proclivities will get you maimed, wounded,
crippled or destroyed for some of their own, bastard,
adult ends. You really
ought to stab your parents to
death when you're like about ten. It would
probably
all work out the same.
-
I
never really wavered from my tasks. I would
read the get-your-hands black (back
then the ink u
sed to rub off) 1960's, thin-columned, endlessly
wordy New York
Times, nightly. Spread out on my
hard-tiled floor in my room upstairs, I'd read
page
after page items about far-off places, the
mechanizations of men, Congo,
Asia, China,
Soviets, space-competitions, Nazi-history
investigations,
auto-industry items. Until late at
night - oftentimes my wearied mother would
climb the stairs, knock and open the door, and
quizzically look at what I was
doing, reading on the
floor some stupidity like a scribe, shake her head,
and
tell me it was late and that I should get to sleep.
There was an endless war or
skirmish always
underway somewhere - Brazzaville, all of Africa,
Congo,
Swaziland, Taiwan vs. mainland China,
Appalachian poverty and problems right at
home
in the USA, civil rights troubles, school desegregation,
slums, urban
renewal, everything all a'twirl at the
same moment. Something big was brewing; I
could
feel it, I could already understand it, but just wasn't
sure of the
approach. Life. Death. Little mattered.
Occasionally things would pop up; my own
ideas
and interpretations : 'desegregation' - using such
a word, I felt, was
wrong - it somehow made valid
the existence of 'segregation', assuming all one
had to do was correct it, as without changing it
or re-formulating first the
dumb way people
thought. Thinking about what I read of those
weird, odd
southerners and all their 'separate'
Woolworth's food counters, restaurants and
bathrooms and water fountains, I would just
think - what's wrong with these
asshole people?
How stupid could a people be? What race of
Neanderthals had they
themselves descended
from that they could still subsist in this manner -
their
screaming diatribes, shouting at schoolbuses
and children, protecting their own
supposed 'rights'
(which did not really exist anyway)? Pimply-faced
fat southern
goons. Adults? These were supposed
adults - grown and mature people
who were
assumed ready to lead others. They turned out
to all be liars and
jerks. I found that money and
corruption left its presence everywhere.
African-bound cargoes of foods and medicines,
large sums of monies, all stolen,
swept away
by corrupt leaders of corrupt governments run
by small mobs of
corrupt people. Theft and
malfeasance were everywhere. The dead and the
dying
loomed as a result. War was nothing. War
had just become a cover, an excuse for
cover -
to cover and obscure the thievery and corruption
wherever it could be
concealed. Nothing was
straight, people were crooked bastards, mostly
moreso the
nearer to the top one got - this
went for the USA too; no distinctions
made.
-
When
you're 12 years old I don't think you're
supposed to have already reached the
point of
saying 'Oh, what the hell...' It seems way too early
to find futility
and the grassy island of doubt so
soon and already sidelining you. It's a tough
thing
to get over : it affects how you can talk and honor
and respond to things.
I had to carry that around.
I was ruined pretty early, and nothing more about
any of it really seemed to work for me. I wanted out.
Boyhood fades; the world intrudes. How was I
supposed to observe or see or watch things in that
condition? The stupidity of a
symbolic thing, like
the CBS Eye, as a for instance - something everyone
else
accepted and looked for. This little place I was
in - a thin strip of street
not even a commercial street
any longer - barren, derelict, cut in two by
roadways,
a lumber yard, a train station seemingly now an
afterthought (everyone
had their flashy cars to ride
in instead), two or three 'candy' stores, selling
nothing more than leftover pennypacks -
it was really a non-entity, a
no-connected
nowheresville. I was ready to cash out. Had I been
4 years older, I
would have just jumped a train
(not 'in front of', just jumped on), or
hitch-hiked
Route One and disappeared. As it were I worked
hard on finding other
ways to get out.
Hello Blackwood, (seminary days), I suppose.
Again, I'll repeat : I've
found most of life to be a
symbolic reality - people placing space and the
things they do into mental landscapes which -
while not real at all - reach
the level of 'real' by
fulfilling symbolic needs. This can be argued all
day -
and I'd probably be the first to do it - but
I am certain I could argue it to
a perfect clarity
and win. As I was growing up, the street I lived
on had, as
well and for itself, attained that level
of being - it was a line of houses to
which was
attached a serial decision-making for the
placement of like and
symbolic items by each
family, random or not, along the way. A sameness
in cars
: boats, pools, lawns, driveways, furniture,
decks and patios (New Jersey
patios, I always
thought, bring a certain 'patois'). Symbolic
preferences for
lives not really lived; references
too, I suppose. Nothing on Inman Avenue bore
any real substance, it all seemed image and symbol.
The time of being - the
1950's, the 1960's - were in
fact completely artificial and symbolic anyway :
everything managed to be, to exist, from nothing
and completely artificial and
meaningless. Yes,
that still goes on today, of course, but all things
are
different and done differently. The essential
basis 'within a reality of' its
own' Earthness and
substance (that thing we, back then, were just
leaving) is
all gone - everything is ephemeral
and virtual and ethereal, and yet today's
'folk' can
make no distinction on that level at all. They just
live it. Art and
re-purposing buildings in a world
that has so little to say but so many ways of
saying
it - (nothing). So many people live amidst a
symbolic reality of their
own into which and
through which function very well and feel quite
satisfied,
though without knowing. Quite
discursive, no matter. I was just, already, sad
and morose, and sorrowful, and broken.
No comments:
Post a Comment