Saturday, August 4, 2018

11,038. RUDIMENTS pt. 396

RUDIMENTS pt. 396
Making Cars
The seminary stuff, and church
stuff in general, was pretty weird.
Like that whole thing about ladies
having to have their heads covered,
or, well, something on their heads,
to enter church. In each of the years
I was at the seminary, except for
visit days and special events (rare)
I never saw a female present. Not
even a nun. Not one. So that entire
stricture was pretty much out the
window. I couldn't ever figure it
out, on those special days, as I
mentioned, when females were
present. What was the big deal?
Some men still wore hats, and they
had to come off? What the heck
was that about? Medieval levels
of personal rank? Servitude? Who
cared, least of all God? If it was
a Mankind thing, OK, then get
over it. The whole thing seemed
so petty and stupid. The same God
who watches the birds of the air,
fish of the sea, and counted the hairs
on your head, he watched the human
hat situation too? Busy guy.
-
The other thing that really annoyed
me, and it was pretty slimy and
sickening too, was when these
stupid-ass priests and brothers would
take to the pulpit there in the little
chapel thing we had, which was
our 'church' for all the three times
a day stuff we had to do, and go
on about 'Holy Mother the church
was the Bride of Christ...' What
the hell? What were they, freaking
nut-cases all? Shut-in too long in
their cork-lined male confraternity?
I'd learned about allegory, metaphor,
analogy, and like simile too (joke)
but I guess they'd left out 'cockamamie
bullshit.' Made up concepts. Diatribes
of un-needed precision and logic.
And anyway, I found that anytime,
in the Gospels, that they came across
Jesus being a little strange, talking
weird  -  something that, in reality,
didn't fit the picture too well  -
they'd brush it off by saying, 'oh,
well, he was speaking in allegories
and parables,' and then they'd start
bashing his peasantry-audience for
being a bunch of stupid Aramaic
slobs and dumb fisherman who
didn't know any better and who
could only grasp stories and
parables. How were they any
different than the Sunday
morning fools back in Avenel
at St. Andrew's, I wanted to
know? Wasn't that a bit of
dis-respect and condescencion
to all those people you were
supposedly dependent upon for
Sunday-morning's collections
baskets?
-
Back up in that 9th line, at the
beginning of this chapter, I got
a chuckle  -  I wondered if any
of those priests and brothers,
who pretended to know it all
about sex and love and marriage,
had even an inkling of what the
female 'present' even was.
Gift-giving never had it
so good?
-
Everything took some getting
used to. Parts of my mind were
still stuck back in Avenel, right
along Inman Avenue where I
could still remember vividly
the cold, snowy Winter of '61
when the street had been covered
with a mantle of snow that was
pretty much never tended to and
did eventually melt and refreeze,
a few times, into a nice, solid
snow-pack of two or three inches
that remained for at least a week
in the cold. As kids, it became
day after day of solid snow-fun
on an ice and snow covered
street. The slow melting that
did take place began at the
manhole covers and sewer areas,
and ever-so-slowly, over the
course of a few days, spread out.
I can't remember cars at all, except
for the few, noisy, chain-tired cars
that occasionally slapped along.
That was all back when it seemed
that Time would never end, or that
it had was of just getting stuck
in an endless present. And it 
was all so strange as, later on, 
in talking, that that was the same
cold and snowy January that
one Bob Dylan arrived in NYC
with his cartload of fictions and
made-up stuff, or that it was the
same time as all those Maynard 
J. Krebs versions of beatnik
dopplegangers were wildy fading
and the scene was passing to
folkies, and that another scene
entire was a'borning. The times
they were far-ranging. I was 11,
and at the end of my kidhood 
days. All that change crap
was already in the air. People
were convincing each other, or
trying to anyway, that the big
'difference' was coming.
I had to be ready too.
-
I'd never had a scared-space, like
I learned, later on, many others had.
That took some money and privilege;
things I never possessed. Being poor
has its advantages, if you can manage
to step back and look away  -  just
gleaning and lessons and the values.
The rest of life is just mopping up.
Avenel had certainly never provided
me anything like that  -  in all respects
a rather one-dimensional, humdrum
place, made up  -  perhaps  -  of a few
characters amid two-thousand ordinary
stiffs. Growing up, it was all rather
tame, lame, and ordinary. Dreaming
of becoming a spy? They don't hire
out of Avenel. Once I lost it, whatever
it was  -  control, command, awareness  -
over my own life and my own being,
I'd just end up as one of them. And I
knew I'd sworn off, against any and
all, of that. Where I was going, I
was never sure. I knew where I was,
and stupidly I realized that 'where
I was' wasn't where I wanted to 
remain. The whole calculus had
to begin spinning once more,
turning things around and
over, re-negogiating what was
fact, what was real, and
what was false.


Thursday, August 2, 2018

11,037. EXCORIATE THE MAGISTRATE

EXCORIATE THE MAGISTRATE
Wonderful impediments, all these things,
and how alike we are. It seems, anyway,
that we breath the same air. You stand
there; I stand here. Sumo wrestlers
never had it so good.
-
Look, look, I brought a wren to show
and tell, and all you've got is a photo
of some lame community garden.

Wednesday, August 1, 2018

11,036. TO WHOM

TO WHOM
I think I owe my allegiance
to a greater concept of Time.
A greater 'Being' to be sure,
using our comfortable term.
Yet it's not that at all  -  it's a
traveling circumference of
a sense of presence that comes
back, and wants to come back,
to twirl over itself again and
renew the world. This is a
circular spin, an energy in a 
deep space, or sense, of Time,
which is all we'll be judged by
really. What we've made of our
beings. I am called to bring forth
my record of what has been, for
long days future, all that 'day's
journey into night,' idea but far 
expanded past that here.

11,035. RUDIMENTS, pt. 395

RUDIMENTS, pt. 395
(the art of avenel)
The seminary had a tiny art
department  (that's funny. I
don't mean to say they made
miniatures) - oddly enough
mostly manned by Mike
Bartholomew, once again. 
(influential) front and center.
Art, I'd have to admit, at 11 was 
a new idea to me, brought to me
by Mike. The compact work area
and art section was little used,
except by him. There were a few
cans with brushes in them, that 
wonderful smell of turpentine
and linseed oil (same smell which
later permeated every life-breath
at the Studio School. It's one of
those floating aromas that soak
to the spirit and soul of the artist
within those who have that set
of antennae to pick it up). I can't
remember what he painted, nor
a 'style' he perhaps was messing
with, but it was 'Art' to me, and
the idea had introduced itself,
never to leave. All new too. I
never did thank him for all this
stuff  -  the jazz, the theater, the
black coffee hipsterism, and the
paint, but God-damned if I
hadn't finally found a new key
to unlock my way out of Hell.
-
All of this, fortunately, became 
the background scrim of the 
play of my life, a bit of leitmotif
at the rear wall of reference. It's
pretty much what I stayed with,
long after the seminary was
gone down the drain for me. 
The idea of the background of
a painting having resonance
always rang within. By the
artworld of those later 60's
it was, of course, difficult to
make present - most art had
given up on any semblance of
'picture' or of being something
even recognizable, so a scene
in the background didn't exist
anyway. But, in my mind, I'd
take that idea out to the street
with me and realize it was at
the same time the very story
of life itself. We are always,
as our own portrait, seen as in
our own foregrounds : total
psychological basket cases
of ego, egocentricity,
dominance, self-awareness,
etc. That's where our identity
- culturally and societally -
comes from. But it's really
the scenes behind us that
make up our activities
and beings. And they
are seen, as it were, only
behind us - we never
really face them off out
front of us, because
it's 'out front' where
they are being made.
To really underscore
the word 'hindsight,'
I suppose.
-
You can't get all cracked
up over stuff like that,
because then you begin
'altering' it - and it's no
longer real, or authentic,
or even vibrant. As in
Quantum Physics just the
viewing of a situation, or
the experiment, changes
the result being sought :
Things change when under
observation, and somehow
'become' no longer their own
or 'themselves'. How very odd,
I always thought. Erroneously,
in Physics, and by laymen,
this is usually called the
'Heisenberg Uncertainty
Principle', and that name,
yes, has stuck, but really
it's the 'Observer Principle.'
The Heisenberg Principle
is actually something a
little different, but I'm
not going into it now,
you can look it up
yourselves, if sought.
-
My point was in how, as
individuals, that big,
churning scene behind
us is often unseen
as we forge straight
ahead, forming our
selves and beings.
Leonardo and those
guys, with all their
little background scenes
always in the rear of
these quite meticulously
detailed paintings and
portraits, (yes, again, like
the Mona Lisa) were - and
without even knowing it - in
both their very-pre-Freudian
and pre-psychological awareness
days and times - presaging
all of that, quite symbolically.
We only now know how to
read that language. (By the
way, this is my theory, my
own 'art' thought, and I had
not or have not actually
read that yet anywhere,
though it perhaps may so
be. I do though sincerely
and authentically, and
maybe naively too, hereby
claim it). I also realize that
what's 'before' and what's
'behind' depends on where
you're standing. And then,
only a little later, if you push
the envelope, you get to
both Hieronymus Bosch
and Pieter Brueghel, where
the background has become
all - an intense screen of
total activity. All that 'Fall of
Icarus' stuff, and those weird
ground-beings and the
pastoral happenings
on every front. It was
all pretty amazing,
and quite soon. It's a
bit - but only a bit - akin
to the ephemera of today's
suck-ass 'virtual' world in
which kids get all sidetracked
chasing down imaginary
scenes and planted stuff.
As an artist, hell, that's kind
of what you're always doing
anyway - mostly with no one
listening. Kids now, they're all
communally geeked-out trading
orgasms over some Mickey
Mouse in a doughnut roll
somewhere, and listening,
very unfortunately, only to
themselves. Once more the
background has become the
foreground, but for no good
reason at all except for the
nice scrim of ephemeral junk
it provides. Just because they
fall for it, doesn't mean it's any
good - and just because I can
look up your address on any
web-search, and find out
where you live, doesn't mean
I want to go there and visit.
Crazy world.
-
Speaking of which (crazy world),
just about that same time a few
weird things were happening -
sorts of real, defining things.
As viewed then anyway. One
was a song that was eventually
'banned' or at least pulled
from the playlists of WMCA
and WABC, I think, entitled
something like 'They're
Coming To Take Me Away,
Ha Ha....' to the funny farm, etc.
It was sort of spoken over some
repeated drum motif, and with
also some distorted voice play
too, I think, about some guys's
mental state after a breakup,
and then it sort of ends up
with him talking to his dog.
Jerry Samuels that was. And
the crazy world of Arthur
Brown. 'Fire' or 'You're
Gonna' Burn', something
like that. Both of them were
pretty useless, 'industry' 
songs, put out in spite of 
all the counter-cultural 
ferment going on. Absolutely
no content or gravitas, just
a dumb slap-in-the-face to
the real street issues underway.
Like bad art, like Happenings
and all that high-society fake 
art cocktail party stuff that 
was just beginning - all 
an affront. To top it off, 
when the 'industry' really 
got hip - in its own mind - 
and really felt ready to hit
back, what did they give us?
You guessed it : Strawberry
Alarm Clock, with something 
crappy called 'Incense and
Peppermint, Curse of Mankind.'
If I could have ripped their 
scalps off, I would have.

11,034. RUDIMENTS, pt. 394

RUDIMENTS, pt. 394
(TV time somewhere)
I always figured there were
a lot of destitute channels
everywhere and I was glad
to have never met up with
any of that. The surprising
thing, all those years, was
the media silence I lived
amidst. Except for 'tragedies'
like Kennedy's Dallas killing
and all the funeral and things
of the rites and processions
and all, which we got to see,
(this included the surpises
too, like Jack Ruby killing
Oswald on live TV like that),
there was also (curiously)
the death of Malcom X. But,
anyway, I see now there's an
entire raft of things  - from like
the Munsters to Green Acres to
Beverly Hillbillies to Mr. Ed,
and a hundred more  -  that I
never got to see and no 'cultural'
reference to later when people
back at home started talking
about all that crap. The James
Bond movies, say, or Star
Trek. All these high school
idiots, back in Woodbridge, at
lunch and all, would be talking
Star Trek crap, constantly. I
was aghast at the moronic
lengths people would go to
in order to flavor or favor
(both) any of these strictly
TV characters. It all baffled
me. I was therefore always a
little out of the mix, even long
after. In the years around 1972,
in Pennsylvania when I had as
one of my small jobs the taking
care of the local schoolhouse
(it's since become a junkyard,
yes, and my old school house
is used for office area, cashier,
and parts-bins), the welfare
department for a while sent
me this older man  -  probably
45 to my 27, to use for handiwork
and mopping and all. I had
no choice in the matter; he
was kind of a local cracker,
no education to speak of, had
done Army time, in Korea as
I recall, and jabbered on about
all that, and he came from
Conshohocken, PA, which is
like a suburb of Philadelphia,
nothing to do with the high,
rural country we were in at
Columbia Crossroads. He
insisted always on saying
'Connieshohawkin' instead
of Conshohocken. Not that
it mattered, but it drove me
nuts because I didn't know
if he knew he was doing that
or if it was just a quirk. No
mind. He talked a lot about
guns, and girls, and all the
rudest things about girls
you'd want to know. Oh,
yeah, a real earful he was.
Lucky he wasn't a filmmaker,
because they'd have been
some real burners. Anyway,
as it turned out, he was a
bum loafer, and I never really
bothered him over it. All he
wanted to do (it was Summer,
no school) was watch daytime
TV  -  which ranged from
everyday, and I mean every day,
Beverly Hillbilies, some
Perry Mason, and whatever
other ass-wipe re-runs they'd
play. He'd set up a TV on the
cafeteria table. The piano on
the stage was quite nearby, and
his constant TV time shut down
by piano time, which also was
annoying. (We didn't get much
work done that Summer  -
stripping and waxing the
floors mostly, by me, mostly,
and fixing some window glass,
and moldings). I filled out the
welfare paperwork with the
usual exaggerations and lies,
and I guess he got his pay or
whatever he got. No one ever
checked on him. He drove a big
old 'Cheevrolet,' (which is as
he pronounced it), that was
mountain-running on like 3
cylinders, I swear. So, my
non-exposure in those 
seminary years, by the 
time of my sojourn to
Pennsylvania almost 
turned into over-exposure 
to American idiot stuff  -  
but I just turned away.
-
What I was meaning to say  - 
before that digression  - was
that there was no 'media' in 
the seminary. No one used a
radio, the TV's were used
sparingly, at least in the
circles I ran. Perhaps I am
wrong just because I did
frequent the rooms and
lounges where they were.
All I really remember was
theater area, and my friend,
Mike Bartholomew. I don't
know much about him; he was
a year or two ahead of me; tall,
direct, smart, and punchy. He
had a record player, and a fine
collection of jazz  -  be-bop
stuff and modern 50's and 60's
jazz. He drank great, large mugs
of black coffee. Pretty much, to
me he was a beatnik of the past
but in the future, if you can sort
of get that. I fell right in  -  John
Coltrane, Miles Davis, Theolonius
Monk, Modern Jazz Quartet, 
Dave Brubeck, on and on, you 
name it we had it. I even got
into the coffee thing, but I
hated it black, and milk, 
though plentiful, meant still
another trip to the food section.
So I played at black coffee some.
You have to understand, there
was no store, nothing for us to
do but those vending machines.
The thing about Mike was, he
played guitar, electric. And he
had a small group of two or three
other guys and they had this little
band. They called themseves
'Laissez Faire'  -  it's a French
economics term really, meaning
'Hands Off' or 'Leave Us Alone'  -
in the economic realm it refers to
rules and controls and taxation and
all that business stuff; but for us,
and his little group (I wasn't a part
of the band thing) it just meant
us. Paradoxically, actually, and
stupidly, since we were willingly
engaged into a Christian concentration
camp setting, but willingly, and of
our own choosing. Whatever. The
Thing with this band was, under
Mike's tutelage, they could take
any song, and I say ANY, meaning
commercial ditty or Christmas
carol too, and turn it into basic,
three-chord rock and roll and 
you'd still know what it was. 
It was crazy cool, for junk-band, 
garage band kind of trash.
There was never any exalted
jazz attempted, mainly because
of respect for it  -  cheesy guitars
and drums would have just been
a dis-service. Priests of the
future? Us? No, fact of the
matter was were all all just 
hiding out  -  from something,
from whatever. None of 
us made it through.